HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
google
UIforETW
C++2015–2023
google / UIforETW · Archived

UIforETW

User interface for recording and managing ETW traces

7Distinct people
8Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
1.7KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

User interface for recording and managing ETW traces

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 10:49:33 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year8 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-08-27 16:32:27 UTC to 2023-09-24 13:47:11 UTC.

0122015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20152016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20192020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2023

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
Seconding the post. The post focuses on strace & friends in the Linux/Mac world; for Windows, a powerful tool to look into is Event Tracing for Windows, which lets you trace events, syscalls and performance counters for everything that's running. I.e. a global trace of all (or at least most) processes. Two main tools to look into are xperf, the cmdline tool for configuring and running trace sessions, and Windows Performance Analyzer, a GUI app for exploring recorded traces (additionally, there's Windows Performance Recorder, which seems to be an official GUI for xperf, but I haven't used it myself yet). This is essentially a superpower that's even less known than strace is by Linux devs. I've only learned the basics quite recently, and already used it to debug two hairy issues in few hours, that have already taken a man-month worth of tim
Read the rest
e and would likely take another one. Being able to explore the recordings of the process tree evolution, see all file IO operations, their times and targets and relation to everything else happening in the system, all in both visual and tabular form - it gives you a perspective you otherwise can't get. (An unfortunate side effect is that the tough bugs, like multiprocess race conditions or silent crashes, all seem to be directed my way nowadays.) Unfortunately, xperf and WPA don't come pre-installed in most Windows distributions; the fastest way to get them is through UIforETW[0] - Google's UI for xperf that can automatically locate and install the correct version of Windows Performance Toolkit[1]. Bruce Dawson (of Google Chrome fame) wrote a lot about advanced usage of this tooling, see: https://randomascii.wordpress.com/2015/09/24/etw-central/. -- [0] - https://github.com/google/UIforETW/releases - fetch the newest .zip package with binaries. [1] - Alternative approach, if you need xperf on a computer with no Internet access (happened to me the other day with a customer's VM), you need to download the Windows SDK ISO (e.g. https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/downloads/wind...), mount it, and grab the Windows Performance Toolkit installer from the mounted image.
In Extreme Debugging
There is a whole series of very interesting (even exciting) analyses by this author (randomascii, Bruce Dawson). Most of them are using his own tool UIforETW (https://github.com/google/UIforETW/). I wonder, what alternative tool would you use on Mac? I guess Xcode Instruments in some variant? And this is based on DTrace, right? Would that give you all the same possibilities and traces as UIforETW? And what alternative tool would you use on Linux? perf? eBPF? That would give you the same information as UIforETW? And what GUI would be similar to UIforETW or Xcode instruments?
In What Outranks Thread Priority?

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.