HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
GreptimeTeam
greptimedb
Rust2022–2026
GreptimeTeam / greptimedb

greptimedb

The open-source observability database. One columnar engine for metrics, logs, and traces, on object storage.

9Distinct people
14Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
6.8KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

The open-source observability database. One columnar engine for metrics, logs, and traces, on object storage.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year14 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2022-11-15 12:18:10 UTC to 2026-02-04 14:48:15 UTC.

024682022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments20222023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 4 submissions, 4 comments20242025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC844
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC312
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

14 sources
Hi HN — I’m the creator of GreptimeDB. We just shipped v1.0.0-rc.1 (our first 1.0 release candidate / feature-freeze milestone). Highlights: Online region repartition (SPLIT/MERGE) to adjust partitions at runtime (distributed clusters; shared object storage + GC). Faster Metric Engine PK filters via memcomparable byte comparisons (microbench: ~20–90× on dense codec). PromQL planner prefers TSID (skips unnecessary label columns). Would love feedback from folks running observability/time-series workloads, especially on upgrade paths + repartition behavior in real clusters. GitHub releases/changelog: https://github.com/GreptimeTeam/greptimedb/releases
In [dead]
We also started with the typical kube-prometheus-stack, but we don’t like Prometheus/PromQL. Moreover, it only solves the „metrics“ part - to handle logs and traces, more quite heavy and complex components have to be added to the observability stack. This didn‘t feel right, so we looked around and found greptimedb https://github.com/GreptimeTeam/greptimedb, which simplifies the whole stack. It‘s designed to handle metrics, logs, and traces. We collect metrics and logs via OpenTelemetry, and visualize them with Grafana. It provides endpoints for Postgres, MySQL, PromQL; we‘re happy to be able to build dashboards using SQL as that’s where we have the most knowledge. The benchmarks look promising, but our k8s clusters aren’t huge anyway. As a platform engineer, we appreciate the simplicity of our observability stack. Any other happy greptime
Read the rest
db users around here? Together with OTel, we think we can handle all future obs needs.
In I can't recommend Grafana anymore
I believe the primary issue with using full-text search in PostgreSQL is its performance and scalability limitations. Elasticsearch/OpenSearch offers more than just search functionality; they come with extensive ecosystems, including ELK for logging and processors for ETL pipelines. These platforms are powerful and provide out-of-the-box solutions for developers. However, as the article mentioned, scaling them up or out can be costly. ParadeDB looks like is based on tantivy(https://github.com/quickwit-oss/tantivy) which is an impressive project. We leverage it to implement full-text indexing for GreptimeDB too (https://github.com/GreptimeTeam/greptimedb). Nevertheless, building full-text indexes with Tantivy is still resource-intensive. This is why Grafana Loki, which only indexes tags instead of building full-text indexes, is popular in
Read the rest
the observability space. In GreptimeDB, we offer users the flexibility to choose whether to build full-text indexes for text fields, while always creating inverted indexes for tags.
In Full text search over Postgres: Elasticsearch vs. alternatives
Thanks for your sharing. I was ever working actively on Apache Kvrocks, an alternative for Redis on Flash. And we benefit a lot from Redis docs to catch up its command. In comparison, Kvrocks docs is clearly "less than awesome". In my $DAYJOB, I convince my boss that the docs, at least the README is important, as you show the esbuild example here. Here are two patches to improve the README of it: * https://github.com/GreptimeTeam/greptimedb/pull/3528 * https://github.com/GreptimeTeam/greptimedb/pull/3522 That in #3522 firstly, I tried to reduce the content and "offload" the detailed docs into the doc site. And in #3528, I found that heading elements center align is still fancy and we need some short, clear introduction and advantages. Anyway, a good product is the leading 1 and docs is the following 0. Without a good product, no good docs
Read the rest
can be present.
In Two open source projects with great architecture documentation
This is truly a fantastic combination -- implement the logic in Rust and use it in Python. GreptimeDB also implements a similar functionality that allows writing Python script to do post-process of SQL query results, with the help of RustPython and Arrow. Maybe this combination can bring a sweet point between performance and efficiency. docs: https://docs.greptime.com/user-guide/coprocessor-and-scripti... code: https://github.com/GreptimeTeam/greptimedb/tree/develop/src/...
In Extending Python with Rust

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.