HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
grpc
grpc-rust
Rust2020–2025
grpc / grpc-rust

grpc-rust

A native gRPC client & server implementation with async/await support.

4Distinct people
4Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
12.6KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A native gRPC client & server implementation with async/await support.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 4:00:59 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year4 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2020-05-04 08:15:34 UTC to 2025-12-10 03:42:05 UTC.

0122020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments20202021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20222023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

2 sources
Are the benchmarks actually fair? See: https://github.com/apache/fory/blob/fd1d53bd0fbbc5e0ce6d53ef... It seems if the serialization object is not a "Fory" struct, then it is forced to go through to/from conversion as part of the measured serialization work: https://github.com/apache/fory/blob/fd1d53bd0fbbc5e0ce6d53ef... The to/from type of work includes cloning Strings: https://github.com/apache/fory/blob/fd1d53bd0fbbc5e0ce6d53ef... reallocating growing arrays with collect: https://github.com/apache/fory/blob/fd1d53bd0fbbc5e0ce6d53ef... I'd think that the to/from Fory types is shouldn't be part of the tests. Also, when used in an actual system tonic would be providing a 8KB buffer to write into, not just a Vec::default() that may need to be resized multiple times: https://github.com/hyperium/tonic/blob/147c94cd661c0015af2e5...
In Show HN: Apache Fory Rust – 10-20x faster serialization than JSON/Protobuf

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.