HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
grugq
PORTALofPi
Shell2013–2018
grugq / PORTALofPi

PORTALofPi

PORTAL of Pi - RaspberyPi based PORTAL device. Certified UNIX Network Technicians only!

11Distinct people
13Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
340GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

PORTAL of Pi - RaspberyPi based PORTAL device. Certified UNIX Network Technicians only!

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year13 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2013-06-15 00:09:18 UTC to 2018-12-23 18:56:03 UTC.

02462013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 0 submissions, 5 comments20132014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 6 mentions; 0 submissions, 6 comments2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20152016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2018

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC505
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC606
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

13 sources
for anyone clicking around like me searching for the code, and more description on the bird name(assuming it's some mozilla thing), it is[1] (and the repo [2]) i was assuming this would be some sort of xulrunner app(for some reason a non native chat client strikes me odd for some reason, but meh). it's actually an old seamonkey "fork" from what i gather, but i'm not sure if that's still the case. can someone comment on why a browser is more desirable? i'm guessing it's, because of random bugs appearing where dns or other things may be leaked, and crossplatform support.[3] i'm starting to think that the "right"(there i said it) way to deal with all this is if we follow with the portal approach[4](someone had a debian version, feel free to post the link). but instead of running portal on a seperate device it'll be a container in a container
Read the rest
(or light vm). that way the outer container(vm) is the sandbox(portal), then you can run whatever app you want. and yes, i really what i propose is a major pain in the ass to setup, and won't work in windows that well, but meh i don't see why we couldn't make it easier. the main issue in my opinion would really be the privileges it might need. [1]: https://wiki.instantbird.org/Instantbird:related_links#Thing... [2]: https://hg.instantbird.org/ [3]: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/1676 [4]: https://github.com/grugq/PORTALofPi
In Tor Instant Messaging Bundle
You got that so close, but wrong. Cloud services are inherently insecure because you don't have physical control over the devices containing your data. You have to trust that the remote end is secure, and exploiting trust is what intelligence agencies do best. For an encrypted router, here is my script for making a RaspberryPi into a PORTAL: https://github.com/grugq/PORTALofPi And an older blog post on why encryption and tradecraft only get you so far: http://grugq.github.io/blog/2013/03/12/anonymity-is-hard/ Here is the Ruckus Society's manual on "security culture" which has some brief info on why you need physical control over your data storage devices. Includes also some pointers on how to establish strong(er) physical security for your data. http://ruckus.org/article.php?id=789
In Tools For Treason

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.