HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
gsd-build
get-shit-done
JavaScript2026–2026
gsd-build / get-shit-done · Archived

get-shit-done

A light-weight and powerful meta-prompting, context engineering and spec-driven development system for Claude Code by TÂCHES.

17Distinct people
18Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
64.1KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A light-weight and powerful meta-prompting, context engineering and spec-driven development system for Claude Code by TÂCHES.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week18 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2026-01-22 14:00:22 UTC to 2026-05-22 04:51:50 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

012342026-01-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 3 submissions, 1 commentsJan 192026-01-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2026-02-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2026-02-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-02-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2026-02-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2026-03-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2026-03-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsMar 162026-03-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2026-04-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-05-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-05-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-05-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2026-05-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-05-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-05-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-05-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMay 18

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jan 192026-01-19 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-26 00:00:00 UTC431
Jan 262026-01-26 00:00:00 UTC2026-02-02 00:00:00 UTC101
Feb 22026-02-02 00:00:00 UTC2026-02-09 00:00:00 UTC303
Feb 92026-02-09 00:00:00 UTC2026-02-16 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 162026-02-16 00:00:00 UTC2026-02-23 00:00:00 UTC303
Feb 232026-02-23 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 22026-03-02 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-09 00:00:00 UTC101
Mar 92026-03-09 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-16 00:00:00 UTC101
Mar 162026-03-16 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-23 00:00:00 UTC110
Mar 232026-03-23 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-30 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 302026-03-30 00:00:00 UTC2026-04-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 62026-04-06 00:00:00 UTC2026-04-13 00:00:00 UTC202
Apr 132026-04-13 00:00:00 UTC2026-04-20 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 202026-04-20 00:00:00 UTC2026-04-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 272026-04-27 00:00:00 UTC2026-05-04 00:00:00 UTC000
May 42026-05-04 00:00:00 UTC2026-05-11 00:00:00 UTC101
May 112026-05-11 00:00:00 UTC2026-05-18 00:00:00 UTC000
May 182026-05-18 00:00:00 UTC2026-05-25 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

18 sources
Your task is certainly doable though. You can ask AI to focus on the functional aspects and create a design-only document. It can do that in chunks. You don't need to know about COBOL best practices now, that's an implementation detail. Is the plan to modernize the COBOL codebase or to rewrite in a different language? See what this skill does in Claude Code, you want something similar: https://github.com/glittercowboy/get-shit-done/blob/main/get...
In LLMs are powerful, but enterprises are deterministic by nature
The GSD tool (get-shit-done) automates a very similar process to this, and has been mind-blowing for larger projects and refactors. https://github.com/glittercowboy/get-shit-done You still need to know the hard parts: precisely what you want to build, all domain/business knowledge questions solved, but this tool automates the rest of the coding and documentation and testing. It's going to be a wild future for software development...
In How to effectively write quality code with AI
You should check out the PAL MCP and then also use this process, its super solid: https://github.com/glittercowboy/get-shit-done The way "Phases" are handled is incredible with research then planning, then execution and no context rot because behind the scenes everything is being saved in a State.md file... I'm on Phase 41 of my own project and the reliability and almost absence of any error is amazing. Investigate and see if its a fit for you. The PAL MCP you can setup to have Gemini with its large context review what Claude codes.
In GPT-5.3-Codex
I've been playing around with the "Superpowers" [0] plugin in Claude Code on a new small project and really like it. Simple enough to understand quickly by reading the GitHub repo and seems to improve the output quality of my projects. There's basically a "brainstorm" /slash command that you go back and forth with, and it places what you came up with in docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md. Then you can run a "write-plan" /slash command on the docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md file, and it'll give you a docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-implementation.md file that you can then feed to the "execute-plan" /slash command, where it breaks everything down into batches, tasks, etc, and actually implements everything (so three /slash commands total.) There's also "GET SHIT DONE" (GSD) [1] that I want to look at, but at first glance it seems
Read the rest
to be a bit more involved than Superpowers with more commands. Maybe it'd be better for larger projects. [0] https://github.com/obra/superpowers [1] https://github.com/glittercowboy/get-shit-done
In A few random notes from Claude coding quite a bit last few weeks

Showing the 15 most recent of 18 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.