HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
Hack-with-Github
Awesome-Hacking
Security & Privacy2016–2019
Hack-with-Github / Awesome-Hacking

Awesome-Hacking

A collection of various awesome lists for hackers, pentesters and security researchers

11Distinct people
12Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
125.4KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A collection of various awesome lists for hackers, pentesters and security researchers

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 6:01:08 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year12 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2016-11-17 04:05:34 UTC to 2019-12-24 16:30:33 UTC.

012342016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 3 submissions, 0 comments20162017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 4 submissions, 0 comments20172018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 1 submissions, 3 comments2019

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC330
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC440
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC413

What Hacker News says

4 sources
Statically linked binaries aren’t exactly a “thing” on Windows... https://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2070/... It appears to patch the SSDT table to intercept system calls to the kernel, and based on forum thread titles, has been caught by PatchGuard in Windows before, but I haven’t investigated myself. From what I can tell, once a privileged process like a kernel driver, starts messing with memory it doesn’t own, like SSDT tables and loaded user-land DLLs, well, game’s over as far as system integrity’s concerned. PatchGuard does integrity checking, but I presume given how common it is, there are known ways to fool it or disable it, perhaps by poisoning whatever it uses to check the SSDT memory. Interesting variations on this technique might be https://github.com/tandasat/DdiMon and https://github.com/tandasat/SimpleSvm
Read the rest
Hook In terms of defense, there’s https://github.com/IgorKorkin/MemoryRanger And for an organized list of far too many examples for me to feel safe, there’s https://github.com/ExpLife0011/awesome-windows-kernel-securi... (Note: over half of the links I clicked at random had Chinese github commit text or readmes, presumably the list author is either searching Github by function calls or understands Chinese...) Less organized for obvious reasons, but this list of 199 starred projects might also be worth a look https://github.com/dmaynor?tab=stars which in turn pointed me to https://github.com/Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking And if you like this, you’ll probably also like: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21481598
In We are making Sandboxie a free tool, with plans to transition it to open source
Are you seriously entertaining the idea that Github should pour resources into developing a SSN detection pipeline? Why don't they also flag repositories with lots of names, those are PII. Too many addresses? That's a red flag. Why would you even for a second entertain this nonsense? Non-technical people who think this: https://github.com/Hack-with-Github/Awesome-Hacking is a smoking gun to prove Github as a company is supporting hackers are the ones putting forth this idea, no one with any technical knowledge should come close to supporting this.
In GitHub sued for aiding hacking in Capital One breach

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.