HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
hashicorp
best-practices
HCL2016–2017
hashicorp / best-practices · Archived

best-practices

Discover this repository through its Hacker News conversations.

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
1.5KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A public description has not been verified.

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by month2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2016-08-03 00:41:11 UTC to 2017-03-18 07:05:13 UTC.

012016-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsAug 20162016-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsNov 20162016-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMar 2017

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Aug 20162016-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-09-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Sep 20162016-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-10-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 20162016-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-11-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 20162016-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-12-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 20162016-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-02-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 20172017-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-03-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 20172017-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-04-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
I cannot recommend Terraform enough for teams that are looking to gut their old infrastructure deployment methods. We used Terraform ~0.7 to build out our EU VPC on AWS. After a bit of pain understanding how to build modules we were finally able to say we have our infrastructure truly in code. We were even able to reproduce our exact infrastructure deployment, with a bit of tweaking, for partner that had strict data privacy requirements. Terraform allowed us to provision a smaller scale deployment of our production deployment on their AWS account in about a days worth of work. We plan on redoing our US deployment Terraform and we we are going to POC their Pro/Enterprise version very soon If you want a great starting point for learning how to do things the right way https://github.com/hashicorp/best-practices/tree/master/terr... helped us
Read the rest
out a lot.
In Terraform 0.9
CloudFormation covers all AWS features in full detail. OTOH, you end up reading and editing tons and tons of JSON that were never meant for human consumption. I don't know what goals Amazon had when they came up with CF, but if human readability was one of them, then they've failed that goal. I've seen a lot of people start writing their own CF management systems, in Python or whatever, and end up with a lot of infrastructure defined in the logic of the homegrown management tool - like a badly written PHP page where presentation and logic are all mixed up. You see that once, you never want to go there again. Terraform does not cover all AWS features, but the exceptions are few and tend to be lesser used features. The file format is human readable (this is subjective to some extent), and can be composed and modularized easily. https://open
Read the rest
credo.com/terraform-infrastructure-design-patter... https://github.com/hashicorp/best-practices https://atlas.hashicorp.com/help/intro/use-cases/multiple-en... https://www.terraform.io/intro/getting-started/modules.html https://www.terraform.io/docs/state/remote/index.html I'm not a big fan of buzzwords and soundbites, but Terraform comes pretty close to fulfilling the ideal of "software-defined infrastructure" in a way that is accessible, easy to use, easy to expand, and just makes sense - in the way a good programming language just makes sense.
In Terraform 0.7 released

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.