HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
hashicorp
hcl
Go2014–2026
hashicorp / hcl

hcl

HCL is the HashiCorp configuration language.

32Distinct people
35Mentions
1Explicit recommenders
5.8KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

HCL is the HashiCorp configuration language.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

I love this. It reminds me of PowerShell configuration files: https://ssg.dev/powershell-accidentally-created-a-nice-confi... This is basically JSON for humans. YAML is harder…

sedatk used a recommendation phrase. One indexed comment matches. This is a phrase match, not a verdict.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 9:01:12 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year35 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2014-08-11 21:25:10 UTC to 2026-04-23 09:32:47 UTC.

02462014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments20142015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 0 submissions, 7 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments20202021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 6 mentions; 0 submissions, 6 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC707
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC404
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC606
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

From the project README

An excerpt from the repository, fetched Nov 13, 2026.

Read the project’s introduction
HCL HCL is a toolkit for creating structured configuration languages that are both human- and machine-friendly, for use with command-line tools. Although intended to be generally useful, it is primarily targeted towards devops tools, servers, etc. NOTE: This is major version 2 of HCL, whose Go API is incompatible with major version 1. Both versions are available for selection in Go Modules projects. HCL 2 cannot be imported from Go projects that are not using Go Modules. For more information, see our version selection guide. HCL has both a native syntax, intended to be pleasant to read and write for humans, and a JSON-based variant that is easier for machines to generate and parse. The HCL native syntax is inspired by libucl, nginx configuration, and others. It includes an expression syntax that allows basic inline computation and, with support from the calling application, use of variables and functions for more dynamic configuration languages. HCL provides a set of constructs that can be used by a calling application to construct a configuration language. The application defines which attribute names and nested block types are expected, and HCL parses the configuration file, verifies that it conforms to the expected structure, and returns high-level objects that the application can use for further processing. package main import ( "log" "github.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2/hclsimple" ) type Config struct { IOMode string `hcl:"io_mode"` Service ServiceConfig `hcl:"service,block"` } type ServiceConfig struct { Protocol string `hcl:"protocol,label"` Type string `hcl:"type,label"` ListenAddr string `hcl:"listen_addr"` Processes []ProcessConfig `hcl:"process,block"` } type ProcessConfig struct { Type string `hcl:"type,label"` Command []string `hcl:"command"` } func main() { var config Config err := hclsimple.DecodeFile("config.hcl", nil, &config) if err != nil { log.Fatalf("Failed to load configuration: %s", err) } log.Printf("Configuration is %#v", config) } A lower-level API is available for applications that need more control over the parsing, decoding, and evaluation of configuration. For more information, see the package documentation. Why? Newcomers to HCL often ask: why not JSON, YAML, etc? Whereas JSON and YAML are formats for serializing data structures, HCL is a syntax and API specifically designed for building structured configuration formats. HCL attempts to strike a compromise between generic serialization formats such as JSON and configuration formats built around full programming languages such as Ruby. HCL syntax is designed to be easily read and written by humans, and allows declarative logic to permit its use in more complex applications. HCL is intended as a base syntax for configuration formats built around key-value pairs and hierarchical blocks whose structure is well-defined by the calling application, and this definition of the configuration structure allows for better error messages and more convenient definition within the calling application. It can't be denied that JSON is very convenient as a lingua franca for interoperability between different pieces of software. Because of this, HCL defines a common configuration model that can be parsed from either its native syntax or from a well-defined equivalent JSON structure. This allows configuration to be provided as a mixture of human-authored configuration files in the native syntax and machine-generated files in JSON. Information Model and Syntax HCL is built around two primary concepts: attributes and blocks. In native syntax, a configuration file for a hypothetical application might look something like this: io_mode = "async" service "http" "web_proxy" { listen_addr = "127.0.0.1:8080" process "main" { command = ["/usr/local/bin/awesome-app", "server"] } process "mgmt" { command = ["/usr/local/bin/awesome-app", "mgmt"] } } The JSON equivalent of this configuration is the following: { "io_mode": "async", "service": { "http": { "web_proxy": { "listen_addr": "127.0.0.1:8080", "process": { "main": { "command": ["/usr/local/bin/awesome-app", "server"] }, "mgmt": { "command": ["/usr/local/bin/awesome-app", "mgmt"] }, } } } } } Regardless of which syntax is used, the API within the calling application is the same. It can either work directly with the low-level attributes and blocks, for more advanced use-cases, or it can use one of the decoder packages to declaratively extract into either Go structs or dynamic value structures. Attribute values can be expressions as well as just literal values: # Arithmetic with literals and application-provided variables sum = 1 + addend # String interpolation and templates message = "Hello, ${name}!" # Application-provided functions shouty_message = upper(message) Although JSON syntax doesn't permit direct use of expressions, the interpolation syntax allows use of arbitrary expressions within JSON strings: { "sum": "${1 + addend}", "message": "Hello, ${name}!", "shouty_message": "${upper(message)}" } For more information, see the detailed specifications: Syntax-agnostic Information Model HCL Native Syntax JSON Representation Changes in 2.0 Version 2.0 of HCL combines the features of HCL 1.0 with those of the interpolation language HIL to produce a single configuration language that supports arbitrary expressions. This new version has a completely new parser and Go API, with no direct migration path. Although the syntax is similar, the implementation takes some very different approaches to improve on some "rough edges" that existed with the original implementation and to allow for more robust error handling. It's possible to import both HCL 1 and HCL 2 into the same program using Go's semantic import versioning mechanism: import ( hcl1 "github.com/hashicorp/hcl" hcl2 "g
Read the full README on GitHub

What Hacker News says

4 sources
Nomad also scales really well. In my experience swarm had a lot of issues with going above 10 machines in a cluster. Stuck containers, containers that are there but swarm can't see them and more. But still i loved using swarm with my 5 node arm cluster, it is a good place to start when you hit the limit of a single node. > The only serious downsides is having to use the HCL DSL ( https://github.com/hashicorp/hcl ) and their web UI being read only in the last versions that i checked. 1. IIRC you can run jobs directly from UI now, but IMO this is kinda useless. Running a job is simple as 'nomad run jobspec.nomad'. You can also run a great alternative UI ( https://github.com/jippi/hashi-ui ). 2. IMO HCL > YAML for job definitions. I've used both extensively and HCL always felt much more human friendly. The way K8s uses YAML looks to me like
Read the rest
stretching it to it's limits and barely readable at times with templates. One thing that makes nomad a go-to for me is that it is able to run workloads pretty much anywhere. Linux, Windows, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Illumos and ofc Mac.
In Harbormaster: Anti-Kubernetes for your personal server
> There is gap in the market between VM oriented simple deployments and kubernetes based setup. In my experience, there are actually two platforms that do this pretty well. First, there's Docker Swarm ( https://docs.docker.com/engine/swarm/ ) - it comes preinstalled with Docker, can handle either single machine deployments or clusters, even multi-master deployments. Furthermore, it just adds a few values to Docker Compose YAML format ( https://docs.docker.com/compose/compose-file/compose-file-v3... ) , so it's incredibly easy to launch containers with it. And there are lovely web interfaces, such as Portainer ( https://www.portainer.io/ ) or Swarmpit ( https://swarmpit.io/ ) for simpler management. Secondly, there's also Hashicorp Nomad ( https://www.nomadproject.io/ ) - it's a single executable package, which allows similar setups to Doc
Read the rest
ker Swarm, integrates nicely with service meshes like Consul ( https://www.consul.io/ ), and also allows non-containerized deployments to be managed, such as Java applications and others ( https://www.nomadproject.io/docs/drivers ). The only serious downsides is having to use the HCL DSL ( https://github.com/hashicorp/hcl ) and their web UI being read only in the last versions that i checked. There are also some other tools, like CapRover ( https://caprover.com/ ) available, but many of those use Docker Swarm under the hood and i personally haven't used them. Of course, if you still want Kubernetes but implemented in a slightly simpler way, then there's also the Rancher K3s project ( https://k3s.io/ ) which packages the core of Kubernetes into a smaller executable and uses SQLite by default for storage, if i recall correctly. I've used it briefly and the resource usage was indeed far more reasonable than that of full Kubernetes clusters (like RKE).
In Harbormaster: Anti-Kubernetes for your personal server
I've only looked at the HashiCorp tools, not really used them. My understanding is they originated in a VM-based world (?), and I've worked almost exclusively with containers. I'm sure that has changed over time. I will say that I looked at HCL and it looks very nice: https://github.com/hashicorp/hcl But somehow it's not as popular as a mess of YAML and Go Templates? That genuinely leaves me scratching my head. I guess it's because people pick platforms and not languages? (BTW, in 2009 I designed and implemented the template language that Go templates are based on, and I find their common application pretty bizarre, e.g. in some Helm charts I looked at from this thread) Oil is growing a config dialect that looks a lot like HCL (although it's convergent evolution; I've never used it.) I think there is a lot of room for mixing declar
Read the rest
ative and imperative; as far as I can see HCL is mostly declarative (defining data structures). Anyway I'd be interested in reading about HashiCorp stuff but for some reason in my neck of the woods I don't hear too much about it. Maybe that's because they're paid services and the open source Kubernetes seems attractive by comparison? Or is it more of a VM vs. container thing?
In Kubernetes is our generation's Multics
I myself would love to see more usage of HCL... after writing a lot of Terraform configurations, it feels so much nicer for me than any JSON or YAML/Helm configuration I have written to this day. We should agree on some kind of HCL-based industry standard and leave all these workarounds via JSON/YAML behind us... e.g. doing Helm logic with these Go templates just looks like a step backwards after writing Terraform HCL code for the last 2-3 years. I understand JSON as a simple interchange format between systems, and is here to stay, but I don't understand all this YAML stuff, with all its quirks, from the K8s/DevOps people, when we have the much nicer HCL... For anyone not used to HCL: https://github.com/hashicorp/hcl
In Running Nomad for a Home Server

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.