HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
helix-editor
helix
Rust2021–2026
helix-editor / helix

helix

A post-modern modal text editor.

116Distinct people
160Mentions
2Explicit recommenders
46.9KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A post-modern modal text editor.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

I think kakoune invented motion action keybinds, but Helix is the one popularizing it. I love helix because it is very fast, it supports everything it needs to, and the…

drekipus used a recommendation phrase. 2 indexed comments match. This is a phrase match, not a verdict.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year160 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2021-06-01 18:16:29 UTC to 2026-10-21 13:45:06 UTC.

010203040502021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 3 submissions, 1 comments20212022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 50 mentions; 6 submissions, 44 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 33 mentions; 1 submissions, 32 comments20232024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 30 mentions; 3 submissions, 27 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 36 mentions; 3 submissions, 33 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 0 submissions, 7 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC431
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC50644
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC33132
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC30327
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC36333
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC707

What Hacker News says

160 sources
This is the dependency list of the just command runner https://github.com/casey/just/blob/master/Cargo.lock And the helix editor https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/blob/master/Cargo.lock Compare them to the dependencies of gnu make (pretty sure it’s only posix) https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/blob/master/m... And vim https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/blob/master/c... ### Downloading the internet to build a smallish software is always bad in my opinion.
In Security advisory: Critical remote code execution vulnerabilities, update now
Oh interesting, I went to look more after you said that and noticed the lack of activity indeed, there's even a discussion about it: https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/discussions/16261 That said, fwiw, I haven't felt the need for anything on it and it feels "complete" to me as far as my daily use goes Maintaining OSS is tough, do you know what the community has been wanting lately that it lacks? Maybe I'm an outlier user or I don't know what I don't know
In Mitos editor is a fork of Helix
Commenting as an outsider to both projects, one possible motivation to fork Helix might be this PR: https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/pull/8675 Helix was originally meant to be a "batteries included" editor without any scripting/plugins. That PR intends to change this and so there is a bit of controversy around it. Overall it looks like the PR will eventually be merged. The Mitos fork could have be made for totally unrelated reasons. This is really just my speculation.
In Mitos editor is a fork of Helix
Tangential but one day when bored at work, I browsed the GitHub discussions for Helix, my main text editor, and the most active thread was regarding adopting an LLM policy for the repo[0]. The maintainer thought it would be beneficial to use an LLM policy similar to Ghostty which is AI friendly with human review. Now the whole topic is "brigaded" by a small number of extremely passionate anti-AI voices that immediately react positively to any pushback against AI usage and negatively to anyone who isn't staunchly anti-AI. Even when presented with, in my opinion, reasonable middle-ground such as only merging maintainable code, the counter-arguments are mostly against the harms of AI (mostly datacenter related) dismissing AI outright and refusal give an any ground. It's a real impasse where the pro-AI or indifferent opinions seem to simply
Read the rest
stop posting when they realize there is going to be no real debate, and the anti-AI individuals swarm on any new input. My personal opinion is I don't care either way -- AI is a tool and if contributors use that tool to improve code or the product, I could care less. I just find this interesting. [0] https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/discussions/15408
In Protecting our FLOSS commons from LLMs
Being a better version of something is an invitation, not an imposition! I'm not a developer and never have been, I study literatureand I use a modal editor for all my writing. If you've ever used Ctrl+C to copy, you've already done something harder than the core concept of modal editing. Modal editing is simpler: you press a single key, and you switch to one (of two) modes. That's it. That's the thing people find intimidating. In one mode the letters you press show up on the screen, in the other the letters you press select/copy/move/etc (like cntrl+c... Except even simpler you only need to press one key). You have to use keyboard keys to go up and down, which I assume you already have some experience with. Learning it is identical to learning a GUI. In Word, you hunt through menus for the word 'cut' or 'paste' and click it. In a modal e
Read the rest
ditor like helix you look up cut or paste on a menu and press the key next to it instead. Except once you remember the key you never have to go look through menus again! Get the hang of it and modal text editors are to word processors what word processors are to typewriters. Except at least typewriters have some charm. All that being said, if you want to sync your notes you'll have to use something like Dropbox or google drive, and I looked up how to install helix and you do have to download and unzip a file (https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/releases). Still, computer science degree not required! Unless you've only ever used android or iOS device in which case all of my assumptions about your familiarity with keyboards and mice is totally off. Still!
In Show HN: Files.md – Open-source alternative to Obsidian
Worth mentioning that while this was very nice work by a Helix enthusiast, it was proposed as a replacement for the official docs and mostly rejected, and for good reasons IMO. An instructive discussion! https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/pull/12127#issuecommen... It's rarely a good idea to do a bunch of work on a big change to an open source project in a direction that has not been validated by the maintainers. Or at least, if you do, do it for your own education and don't have high expectations that it will be merged. The contributor in question had a very good attitude about it.
In Beginner-friendly, unofficial documentation for Helix text editor
I'm a mostly happy helix user - but I'm still struggling to get debugging to work - both with ruby/rails and typescript/node (Adonis). Apparently DAP protocol support has been merged - but I find the documentation lacking, and afaik for typescript/javascript it won't work out of the box, as helix needs a pointers to the dap server (and that can't simply be in PATH)? How are everyone debugging with Helix? https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/discussions/9269
In From VS Code to Helix
jiehong·Oct 22, 2025Submission

Ask HN: Why do editors still struggle with long lines?

I've noticed that editors tend to struggle much more with long lines than long files (many lines), even in 2025 with a recent computer. For example, I was recently working with a csv with 50 columns, and each value was a bit long. Things got sluggish at the end of the lines in Helix [0][1][2]. (side note: diffing this kind of files is also a pain, too, but that's another story) It isn't the first time I notice this issue (the first time I tried diffing some minified Javascript with 100k+ long lines). So I guess it might be due to syntax highlighting on top of text encoding [3]. (To partially answer my own question: this performance metric is probably not tested nor optimised for in the first place. And also because not every edit/movement uses async rendering). [0]: https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/issues/4513 [1]: https://github.com
Read the rest
1 points · Open discussion

Showing the 15 most recent of 160 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.