hello

Are you suggesting they should have chosen Wayland? I think they have a good argument against it: "Wayland: Under development since a long time, it offers no clear advantage over Xorg while it makes things more complicated (e.g, breaks screen recording) --> Use Xorg instead, or (maybe even better) no X server at all but pure framebuffer (like *ELEC does for media centers). Also see https://gist.github.com/probonopd/9feb7c20257af5dd915e3a9f2d... " https://github.com/helloSystem/hello/wiki/Welcome-and-unwelc...

I am very attracted to this idea. I want a clean desktop daily driver that prioritizes UX. I love many of the UX-focused priorities, but a much larger % of their priorities such as Linux vs FreeBSD aren't high for me and don't seem end-user focused. An interesting idea I had never thought to question was considering "App Stores" as package managers. "Package managers for end-user applications: Those are aimed at "managing the system", whereas everything that is to be managed on our system can be managed in the file manager and/or other GUI elements. --> Use package managers to produce a system image, which is considered immutable for the end user (like on almost every embedded system/software appliance)" https://github.com/helloSystem/hello/wiki/Welcome-and-unwelc... Good food for thought. Elsewhere they criticize App Stores for their com