HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
hmarr
mongoengine
Python2010–2010
hmarr / mongoengine

mongoengine

[Moved to mongoengine/mongoengine]

2Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
787GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

[Moved to mongoengine/mongoengine]

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 12:54:37 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2010-01-06 15:58:29 UTC to 2010-04-29 00:02:37 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

012010-01-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-01-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJan 42010-01-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-01-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-01-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-01-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-01-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-02-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-02-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-02-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-02-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-02-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-02-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-03-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsMar 12010-03-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-03-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-03-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-03-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2010-03-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-03-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-03-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-04-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-04-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-04-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-04-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-04-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-04-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-04-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-04-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-05-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsApr 26

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jan 42010-01-04 00:00:00 UTC2010-01-11 00:00:00 UTC101
Jan 112010-01-11 00:00:00 UTC2010-01-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 182010-01-18 00:00:00 UTC2010-01-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 252010-01-25 00:00:00 UTC2010-02-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 12010-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2010-02-08 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 82010-02-08 00:00:00 UTC2010-02-15 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 152010-02-15 00:00:00 UTC2010-02-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 222010-02-22 00:00:00 UTC2010-03-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 12010-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2010-03-08 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 82010-03-08 00:00:00 UTC2010-03-15 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 152010-03-15 00:00:00 UTC2010-03-22 00:00:00 UTC110
Mar 222010-03-22 00:00:00 UTC2010-03-29 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 292010-03-29 00:00:00 UTC2010-04-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 52010-04-05 00:00:00 UTC2010-04-12 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 122010-04-12 00:00:00 UTC2010-04-19 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 192010-04-19 00:00:00 UTC2010-04-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 262010-04-26 00:00:00 UTC2010-05-03 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

3 sources
I'd say it really depends on what you're storing and how you're using it. Redis is great for situations where you need a very large volume of reads and writes, and have a fairly simple data model. See http://simonwillison.net/static/2010/redis-tutorial/ for more information and some use cases. MongoDB allows for data to be structured and queried in more complex ways, and touts itself as more of an alternative to an RDBMS than Redis does. If you're looking to use it with Django, check out MongoEngine at http://github.com/hmarr/mongoengine
In Ask HN: Mongodb vs Redis for Django?
ive been using mongo and tornado together for a while, and its great. i initially chose mongo over couch because of its fast ad hoc querying. the python client is also well-written and well-documented. one thing, though, to watch out for is that only the "unstable" dev version of mongodb (1.3.x) has read concurrency - before 1.3.x, mongo uses a global read/write lock per operation. general and index-assisted reads are ultra-fast in mongo, but a bigger map/reduce or group call will block other requests until complete, possibly causing traffic to back up. because of that global lock, all writes block, too, but i've never had a problem with that IRL. writes are super-fast. if you want an orm for mongo, check out mongoengine on github: http://github.com/hmarr/mongoengine/tree/master/mongoengine/
In Mongodb vs couchdb

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.