HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
hneemann
Digital
Java2020–2026
hneemann / Digital

Digital

A digital logic designer and circuit simulator.

14Distinct people
16Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
6.2KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A digital logic designer and circuit simulator.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year16 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2020-01-10 04:02:42 UTC to 2026-01-03 08:39:06 UTC.

02462020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20202021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 1 submissions, 6 comments20232024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC716
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

16 sources
Theres the open source Digital (https://github.com/hneemann/Digital) which can run simulations but then export Verilog. If you have an ICE40 based GPU then in theory you can then use open source tools (like apio) to get that onto your FPGA. I've seen some impressive fpga tasks being generated by that. I'm early in my learning of FPGA and have done nandgame and some other non-HDL circuit learnings. I have gone back and forth if I want to design my project via HDL or via something like Digital. There's not an easy pro/con either way. For example, everything I've read is that the verilog block diagram tools kinda create isn't behavior, which makes optimization by FPGA compilers hard, because it can't automatically infer optimal feature gate usage if you are giving transistor level HDL vs behavior HDL. Likewise, it's not totally clear if
Read the rest
block diagramming tools can facilitate test bench behavior, which I think I want to prevent regressions.
In Logik: Open-source FPGA toolchain by Zero ASIC
This is a tangent, but in the first question post the OP mentions considering implementing helper circuitry with quote "a GAL16V8 or something but I don't think I understand them well enough, programmers are very expensive and the programming software is closed source & Windows-only as far as I know." I went down this path on a project a few years ago and I just wanted to point out that you can burn the fuse file for the Lattice GAL16v8 or GAL22v10 chips these days using a cheap TL866 Plus programmer... And there is a very cool way to write the JEDEC fuse files- you can draw out the circuitry you want using the [0] Digital simulation package (it is similar to Logisim) and export a compatible bitstream to burn from there. Thus skipping the need to find a way to run the old WinCUPL or the even older DOS program that was used to do the syn
Read the rest
thesis back in the day. [0] https://github.com/hneemann/Digital
In How can I implement a simple asynchronous DRAM controller? (2018)
I'm more curious if there is something that makes visualizing the Verilog easier... for instance, I've done some small projects where I used Digital [0] (which is so unfortunately named, but awesome) to put blocks of Verilog into the visual representation and then connect my blocks together (like ALU, block ram, registers etc) and run simulation. But the problem is taking all that out back to Verilog and then doing my synthesis with Yosys is a manual chore. I am wondering if there is some sorta... IDE that is letting people inspect projects with lots in individual Verilog files quickly and show the structure visually (and manage test benches run Icarus and GTK wave etc). I haven't seen this outside of vendor-specific tools like Xylinx's Vivado and I'm wondering if I am just missing something or if that kinda of IDE doesn't exist in any
Read the rest
open source tools just yet. [0] https://github.com/hneemann/Digital Edit- and yes I get that I'm probably just not used to the management of Verilog codebases and it's no different than software packages with lots of 'modules' and you just work on a module at a time and it isn't that crazy. But I find it odd that there aren't at least some more viz tools, considering functions of a CPU are so 'block' based... I'd love to be able to load up the RTL folder of one of the CPU projects and see how all these Verilog modules are connected to one another and to the top level. Size of the busses, number of instances, etc. As though it were a Logisim project.
In Ao486_MiSTer: i486 core for the MiSTer FPGA gaming system
Well logisim is dead, but evolution is a fork and then there's Digital https://github.com/hneemann/Digital which is I think a reimplementation of Logism's concepts? I also hand designed a custom 16 bit CPU in logisim, because I was struggling to understand Nand2Tetris's HDL as well as I liked, and also because I stopped following the curriculum to go my own way. Logisim has a few hang ups, starting with a rather low upper bound on clock speed, completely single threaded simulation, and no process for PLL or similar clock multiplying strategies so if you want to do internal processor management or microcode based implementations, you will be stuck with an even lower fraction of that clock speed. The UI is slightly clunky by modern standards, debugging complicated circuits is less than fun, and the file format is less than great if you want
Read the rest
to do anything more than no version control and only touching it with logisim
In I Designed My Own 16-Bit CPU [video]
> Maybe it'd be possible to write an integration for the (unmaintained) Logisim to export the schematic to a HDL of some sort to get close. No need, Digital (https://github.com/hneemann/Digital) already does this: > A circuit can be exported to VHDL or Verilog. There is also direct support for the BASYS3 Board and the TinyFPGA BX board. See the documentation for details. The examples folder contains a variant of the example CPU, which runs on a BASYS3 board.
In An 8-bit minicomputer with a fully custom architecture

Showing the 15 most recent of 16 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.