HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
hoshsadiq
adblock-nocoin-list
Adblock Filter List2017–2025
hoshsadiq / adblock-nocoin-list

adblock-nocoin-list

Block lists to prevent JavaScript miners

4Distinct people
5Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
1.5KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Block lists to prevent JavaScript miners

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year5 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2017-09-26 03:24:16 UTC to 2025-02-14 07:23:29 UTC.

01232017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20172018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20212022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

5 sources
> It is absolutely not that. To suggest this, considering the evidence posted, goes beyond idiocy into potential maliciousness The scary IPs are part of DigiCert's CDN for OCSP responder (probably depending where you are and their anycast): https://github.com/hoshsadiq/adblock-nocoin-list/issues/452 The "evidence" is the system made some network calls and DNS lookups. Which you know, you would do when validating a certificate. He also lists some SMB calls to the localnet which are clearly unrelated. tee.c source contains no network code so this would be truly easy to audit. So tell me again what is the damning evidence? Also, are we to believe malware gangs are hosting on Akamai now? They must be in the major leagues. And you call me an idiot? Have a nice day.
In Neovim tee.exe binary dependency exhibiting illegitimate / unauthorized behavior
In this case they're not the first. They're using this block list: https://github.com/hoshsadiq/adblock-nocoin-list Which was already being used by Brave. You can add the same list to your browser's blocker yourself. If you're using uBlock Origin be aware that by default it includes a Resource Abuse block list which contains many of the same entries as the NoCoin list, so there may be no real advantage in adding the NoCoin list. You'd have to check all the entries in both lists to see if you're gaining anything by it.
In Opera now protects you from cryptojacking attacks
> Looks like a blacklist extension to their ad blocker In the blog post comments section they say they're using this block list: https://github.com/hoshsadiq/adblock-nocoin-list The list is compatible with other blockers like uBlock Origin and Adblock Plus so you can add it to your blocker if you want to. By default uBlock Origin already includes a Resource Abuse block list which has many of the same entries as this list. I'm not sure how much the two lists overlap, but if uBlock Origin's Resource Abuse list already has all of the entries from this list then obviously there's no gain in adding it.
In Opera now protects you from cryptojacking attacks

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.