HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
hugapi
hug
Python2015–2019
hugapi / hug

hug

Embrace the APIs of the future. Hug aims to make developing APIs as simple as possible, but no simpler.

8Distinct people
25Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
6.9KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Embrace the APIs of the future. Hug aims to make developing APIs as simple as possible, but no simpler.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 11:00:58 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year25 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-08-12 10:47:50 UTC to 2019-09-23 16:33:32 UTC.

0369122015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 2 submissions, 5 comments20152016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 12 mentions; 3 submissions, 9 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20172018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2019

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC725
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC1239
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303

What Hacker News says

1 sources
It depends how you do micro services. There are middle grounds. One big gain of micro-services is that it guarantees things are separate and can be handled by separate teams if the need arises. That doesn't mean you need to start out that way. For instance in Python I use hug to create my microservices https://github.com/timothycrosley/hug, then I can just install them to create a "monolithic" services that consumes all the microservices, the great thing is that hug allows you to expose both as a webservices, and as a Python library so I can consume as a Python library with no overhead, until the need to split is evident, and then can split up the services with very little work. Of course the need may never arrive, but the modularity that is forced when using micro-services pays dividends quickly regardless
In Enough with the microservices

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.