HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
hugomg
hexiom
Python2012–2019
hugomg / hexiom

hexiom

SAT-based solver for the Hexiom logic puzzle

3Distinct people
5Mentions
1Explicit recommenders
34GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

SAT-based solver for the Hexiom logic puzzle

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

One neat example that comes to my mind is how some package managers use SAT solvers to resolve package conversioning conflicts. I would say that SAT solvers (or SMT solvers,…

ufo used a recommendation phrase. One indexed comment matches. This is a phrase match, not a verdict.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year5 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2012-02-20 17:03:03 UTC to 2019-05-19 15:13:17 UTC.

0122012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments20122013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments20152016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2019

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20122012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

5 sources
ufo·Jul 4, 2015Recommendation phrase
One neat example that comes to my mind is how some package managers use SAT solvers to resolve package conversioning conflicts. I would say that SAT solvers (or SMT solvers, depending on the problem domain) are applicable to almost any kind of problem where the first thing that comes to your mind is implementing a brute-force search using backtracking. SAT solvers implement lots of tricks that are likely to leave naive backtracking algorithms in the dirt (knuth's chapter covers lots of them) One silly example I like is the time I used a SAT solver to find the solutions for a little Flash puzzle game. https://github.com/hugomg/hexiom My favorite part is how I could add some symmetry-breaking predicates to greatly speed up the solver on highly symmetrical problem instances. Those instances are very hard for hand-written algorithms and a SAT
Read the rest
solver let me work around the symmetry problems in a highly declarative manner.
In Current draft of The Art of Computer Programming pre-fascicle 6a [ps]
SAT solvers and SMT solvers are greeat for the kind of problems where your first thought would be to use brute force or backtracking. They use some really clever implementation tricks and heuristics that are likely to beat any of your algorithms that you write from scratch. One of the more famous places where these constraint solvers are used is to deal with dependency management in package systems. For example, zeroinstall uses a SAT solver to resolve dependency conflicts. http://0install.net/solver.html A sillier example is the time I used a sat solver to find the solutions for a flash puzzle game. The part I'm proudest of is that the sat solver could handle the highly symmetric cases that stumped the hand-written backtracking algorithms. And if I had used an SMT solver instead of SAT I would not have had to convert everything all the w
Read the rest
ay doen to boolean formulas. https://github.com/hugomg/hexiom In the readme I explain a bit why the sat solver helped.
In The Z3 Theorem Prover released under MIT license
Are you familiar on how you can use SAT solvers to solve a wide variety of constraint problems? https://github.com/hugomg/hexiom SMT solvers basically extend SAT solvers to allow you to work directly with other theories (linear inequalities, bit arrays, etc) without being forced to encode this as the booloean formulas that basic SAT understand. The idea is that dealing with the higher level details directly instead of having to convert tihngs to a commo low level makes it simpler to express things and can also allow for custumized optimizations and algorithms?
In The Z3 theorem prover is now open source

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.