taws

I built a terminal UI for AWS and shared it 3 days ago. It reached ~1.4k GitHub stars in two days. Using the same architecture and UX approach, I built a GCP version and shared it as well. That one got ~4 stars in two days. I’m curious how people here interpret this difference. Is it about console UX, user demographics, tooling culture, or something else? AWS: https://github.com/huseyinbabal/taws GCP: https://github.com/huseyinbabal/tgcp

Will be available soon ;) https://github.com/huseyinbabal/taws/issues/18

The more you see and review LLM-generated code, the more you can detect its fingerprints. Obviously you're not going to prove this is LLM-generated. I wouldn't bet $1M that it is. This could be 100% human made. But read the same link from above: https://github.com/huseyinbabal/taws/blob/2ce4e24797f7f32a52.... LLMs leave temporal comments like "// Now do X", or "// Do X using the new Y", as responses to prompts like "Can you do X with Y instead?". or below: "// Auto-refresh every 5 seconds (only in Normal mode)". I would guess this comment was during a response to a prompt like: "can you only auto-refresh in Normal mode?" Sometimes there are tautological comments and sometimes not: https://github.com/huseyinbabal/taws/blob/2ce4e24797f7f32a52... ``` // Get log file path let log_path = get_log_path(); ``` This is another signal to me that th

Easiest one is ridiculous comments, always a dead ringer for an LLM. ESPECIALLY when its from a plan and comments '// STEP 2: ...' Like here in this posts repo https://github.com/huseyinbabal/taws/blob/2ce4e24797f7f32a52... This a dead ringer for LLM slop that someone didnt even care enough to go through and clean up. Edit: Just to keep it going, you ever seen a human write dependencies like this for a small toy tui? https://github.com/huseyinbabal/taws/blob/2ce4e24797f7f32a52... Edit2: Sure why not, lets reimplement randomly a custom jsonpath when serde_json_path exists https://github.com/huseyinbabal/taws/blob/2ce4e24797f7f32a52...