HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
IamLumae
Project-Lutum-Veritas
Python2026–2026
IamLumae / Project-Lutum-Veritas

Project-Lutum-Veritas

This is Veritas Research

2Distinct people
5Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
73GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

This is Veritas Research

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by 3-hour interval5 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2026-01-30 09:38:10 UTC to 2026-02-02 14:51:35 UTC.

012026-01-30 09:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-30 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsJan 30, 09:002026-01-30 12:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-30 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-30 15:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-30 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-30 18:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-30 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-30 21:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-31 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-31 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-31 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-31 03:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-31 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-31 06:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-31 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-31 09:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-31 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-31 12:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-31 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-31 15:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-31 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2026-01-31 18:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-31 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-31 21:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJan 31, 21:002026-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-01 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-02-01 03:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-01 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-02-01 06:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-01 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-02-01 09:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-01 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-02-01 12:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-01 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-02-01 15:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-01 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-02-01 18:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-01 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2026-02-01 21:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-02-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-02 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-02-02 03:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-02 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-02-02 06:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-02 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-02-02 09:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-02 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-02-02 12:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-02 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsFeb 2, 12:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jan 30, 09:002026-01-30 09:00:00 UTC2026-01-30 12:00:00 UTC110
Jan 30, 12:002026-01-30 12:00:00 UTC2026-01-30 15:00:00 UTC000
Jan 30, 15:002026-01-30 15:00:00 UTC2026-01-30 18:00:00 UTC000
Jan 30, 18:002026-01-30 18:00:00 UTC2026-01-30 21:00:00 UTC000
Jan 30, 21:002026-01-30 21:00:00 UTC2026-01-31 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 31, 00:002026-01-31 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-31 03:00:00 UTC000
Jan 31, 03:002026-01-31 03:00:00 UTC2026-01-31 06:00:00 UTC000
Jan 31, 06:002026-01-31 06:00:00 UTC2026-01-31 09:00:00 UTC110
Jan 31, 09:002026-01-31 09:00:00 UTC2026-01-31 12:00:00 UTC000
Jan 31, 12:002026-01-31 12:00:00 UTC2026-01-31 15:00:00 UTC000
Jan 31, 15:002026-01-31 15:00:00 UTC2026-01-31 18:00:00 UTC101
Jan 31, 18:002026-01-31 18:00:00 UTC2026-01-31 21:00:00 UTC000
Jan 31, 21:002026-01-31 21:00:00 UTC2026-02-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 1, 00:002026-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-02-01 03:00:00 UTC000
Feb 1, 03:002026-02-01 03:00:00 UTC2026-02-01 06:00:00 UTC000
Feb 1, 06:002026-02-01 06:00:00 UTC2026-02-01 09:00:00 UTC000
Feb 1, 09:002026-02-01 09:00:00 UTC2026-02-01 12:00:00 UTC000
Feb 1, 12:002026-02-01 12:00:00 UTC2026-02-01 15:00:00 UTC000
Feb 1, 15:002026-02-01 15:00:00 UTC2026-02-01 18:00:00 UTC000
Feb 1, 18:002026-02-01 18:00:00 UTC2026-02-01 21:00:00 UTC110
Feb 1, 21:002026-02-01 21:00:00 UTC2026-02-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 2, 00:002026-02-02 00:00:00 UTC2026-02-02 03:00:00 UTC000
Feb 2, 03:002026-02-02 03:00:00 UTC2026-02-02 06:00:00 UTC000
Feb 2, 06:002026-02-02 06:00:00 UTC2026-02-02 09:00:00 UTC000
Feb 2, 09:002026-02-02 09:00:00 UTC2026-02-02 12:00:00 UTC000
Feb 2, 12:002026-02-02 12:00:00 UTC2026-02-02 15:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

5 sources

Show HN: Open Deep Research that beat Big Tech now self-verifies claims

Last week I benchmarked my open-source Deep Research tool against ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini. I caught OpenAI fabricating 4-5 citations that don't exist. Gemini reduced real hazard ratios by 30-40%. So I built ASK Mode: every answer gets automatically verified against a second round of sources. Each claim marked [OK], [??], or [NO]. - ~400 verified answers for $1 - 2-3 minutes per query - No RLHF nannying - it answers what you ask - Full verification report with every response The gap between chat (unverified, stale training data) and deep research (20+ minutes) needed filling. Benchmark proof: https://veritas--test-neocities-org.translate.goog/?_x_tr_sl... GitHub: https://github.com/IamLumae/Project-Lutum-Veritas
2 points · Open discussion

Show HN: Lutum Veritas – open-source deep research engine

I got frustrated with Perplexity/OpenAI Deep Research - expensive subscriptions, shallow results, blocked by Cloudflare. So I built my own. Key features: - Recursive research pipeline (each point builds on previous findings) - Camoufox scraper (0% bot detection rate) - BYOK via OpenRouter - pay only API costs - 200k+ character academic outputs - no Censorship Built with FastAPI + Tauri + vanilla Python (no LangChain). Cost comparison on same query: Lutum $0.20 vs OpenAI o3 $7.36 Happy to answer questions about the architecture.
1 points · Open discussion

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.