BitmapFonts

I don't buy this at all. Too many differences, and at this resolution it is not that improbable for any font to have a doppelganger. Instead of looking for which vector font that have been rasterised at this resolution, I would sooner look for the font in bitmap font collections like this: https://github.com/ianhan/BitmapFonts I wouldn't be surprised though if the font was created 'from scratch'

Agree, but these are not just demoscene fonts, for example I also found the fonts from the original Lemmings game(s) (https://github.com/ianhan/BitmapFonts/blob/main/lemblue.png) which were of course part of a commercial project. But as the games themselves are available as "abandonware" on various sites and Sony (who is sitting on the rights to the Lemmings franchise and not doing much with it) hasn't objected to that yet, I wouldn't worry too much...

There does seem to be consistency in groups with similar names, but e.g. from the first page, two of the same size with different ordering: https://github.com/ianhan/BitmapFonts/blob/main/32_32V1.png https://github.com/ianhan/BitmapFonts/blob/main/32X32-F1.png Still, it's a good point that there's some ordering. Maybe it's not so bad setting up an index by hand for each group.

Good call. https://github.com/ianhan/BitmapFonts/commit/255f865af0dfbe7...