HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
ibraheemdev
modern-unix
Command Line2021–2026
ibraheemdev / modern-unix

modern-unix

A collection of modern/faster/saner alternatives to common unix commands.

15Distinct people
20Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
33KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A collection of modern/faster/saner alternatives to common unix commands.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year20 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2021-01-12 16:01:48 UTC to 2026-05-03 20:20:32 UTC.

024682021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 2 submissions, 6 comments20212022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 1 submissions, 3 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 2 submissions, 1 comments20232024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 2 submissions, 1 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC826
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC413
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC321
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC321
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

20 sources

Ask HN: Will modern alternatives to Unix CLIs be succeeded? grep ripgrep find fd

*Tealdeer:* * Many modern alternatives to Unix CLIs have appeared in the past several years, could there be a successor to tools like ripgrep, lke ripgrep is to grep? Or have we done the best we can for a CLI that searches for text inside files? * Would they be better of 70s Unix machines or would they lots of rewiriting? How much of the improvements in modern tools are the results of good ideas? Could those ideas have been applied to AT&T Unix utils? * How much of the success and potential longevitiy of modern Unix tools are due to being hosted online and worked on by many programmers? * Could computer architectures change significantly in the future, perhaps with ASI designing hardware and software, RAM as fast as CPUs, or photonic chips? Modern alternatives to traditional Unix tools, most of which are written in Rust, have become very
Read the rest
popular in the past several years, here's a whole list of them: [https://github.com/ibraheemdev/modern-unix](https://github.com/ibraheemdev/modern-…. They sort of get to learn the lessons from software history, and implement more features and some have differences in usability. Its hard to predict the future but could the cycle repeat? What are the odds of someone writing a successor to ripgrep that is as (subjectively) better than ripgrep, as ripgrep is to grep, if not more? (and the possibility of it being written in a systems language designed to succeed languages like Rust, like how Rust is used as an alternative to C, C++, etc.). Or, we have gotten all the features, performance, and ease of use as we can for a CLI that searches text in files? It seems like we don't have more ideas for how to improve that, at least with the way computers are now. Are CLIs like Ripgrep better than grep on 70s Unix machines without much rewriting (if they can be compiled for them), or would they require lots of rewriting to run, perhaps to account for their computer architectures or very low hardware specs? Could computer architectures change much in the next 10-30 years such that Ripgrep would need rewriting to work well on them, and or a successor to Ripgrep wouldn't be out of the question? By architectures I don't mean necessarily CPU architectures, but all the hardware present inside the computers, and the relative performance of CPU RAM Storage etc. to each other. If it would take too much effort, what if someone time traveled to the 70s with a computer with ripgrep and its source code? Could Unix engineers apply any ideas from it into their Unix utils? How much of the improvements in newer tools are simply the results of better ideas for how they should work? Unix engineers did their best to make those tools but would the tools be much better if they had the ideas of these newer tools? Also, I wonder if these newer tools would last longer because computers are accessible to the average person today unlike in the 70s, and the internet allows for many programmers with great ideas to collaborate, and easily distribute software. Correct me if I'm wrong but in the 20th century different unixy OSes have their own implementations of Unix tools like grep find etc. While that still applies to some degree, but now we have very popular successors to Unix tools on Github, If you ask online about alternatives to ones like grep and find, a lot of users will say to use ripgrep and fd, and may even post that link I mentioned above. If you want to make your own Unix OS today, you don't need to make your own implementations of these tools, at least from scratch. I only skimmed the top part but this might be worth looking at: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix\_wars](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_wars). Or none of the above happens?
3 points · Open discussion

Ask HN: Which tools are worth the time?

There are an overwhelming number of tools and techniques that (allegedly) improve productivity. With my limited free time and brain capacity, it can be difficult to gauge whether the returns will be worth the time investment. Some examples that come to mind: - Learning more advanced Vim techniques, adding new Vim plugins - Learning more shortcuts for my daily drivers like my IDE(s), shell, etc. - Adding new shell plugins - Learning "modern" tools like ripgrep and fzf (There's a list here: https://github.com/ibraheemdev/modern-unix) - Anything related to Kubernetes like kubectl-aliases or k9s What do you find essential? What gives you the most bang for your buck, and conversely, what do you think is overhyped and not worth the time? It doesn't have to be strictly related to productivity; if you found something that makes your job more enjo
Read the rest
yable I want to hear about that too! One thing I wish I picked up earlier is a familiarity with Perl regular expressions and basic Perl syntax. Perl seems to be everywhere and being able to whip up a fancy one-liner with lookarounds and embedded code execution can be incredibly useful. I wouldn't say there's a steep learning curve, but, like most things, the skill atrophies if not exercised regularly.
3 points · Open discussion

Showing the 15 most recent of 20 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.