HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
iefserge
eshttp
JavaScript2015–2016
iefserge / eshttp

eshttp

Portable pure JavaScript ES6/2015 HTTP library

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
74GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Portable pure JavaScript ES6/2015 HTTP library

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-10-24 10:34:19 UTC to 2016-02-26 10:06:42 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

012015-10-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsOct 192015-10-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-11-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-11-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-11-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-11-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-11-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-11-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-11-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-11-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-11-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-11-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-12-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-12-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-12-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-12-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-12-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-12-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-12-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsDec 212015-12-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-02-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-02-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-02-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-02-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-02-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-02-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-02-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsFeb 22

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Oct 192015-10-19 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-26 00:00:00 UTC110
Oct 262015-10-26 00:00:00 UTC2015-11-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 22015-11-02 00:00:00 UTC2015-11-09 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 92015-11-09 00:00:00 UTC2015-11-16 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 162015-11-16 00:00:00 UTC2015-11-23 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 232015-11-23 00:00:00 UTC2015-11-30 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 302015-11-30 00:00:00 UTC2015-12-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 72015-12-07 00:00:00 UTC2015-12-14 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 142015-12-14 00:00:00 UTC2015-12-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 212015-12-21 00:00:00 UTC2015-12-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 282015-12-28 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 42016-01-04 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 112016-01-11 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 182016-01-18 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 252016-01-25 00:00:00 UTC2016-02-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 12016-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-02-08 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 82016-02-08 00:00:00 UTC2016-02-15 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 152016-02-15 00:00:00 UTC2016-02-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 222016-02-22 00:00:00 UTC2016-02-29 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
Great news! Node.js could greatly benefit from more reimplementations of its native modules. I had implemented the `fs.readdir` module in C and saw some good performance gains (it was a hackish experiment I did some time ago and can't remember numbers). The `http` module is said to be outperformed by `eshttp` [1] by a factor of 2 times, which is written in pure JavaScript. There is also `node-lwan` [2], an experiment in using `lwan` [3] in place of the built in `http` module. Since its the most performant web server in JSON serialization, according to techempower.com benchmarks [4], performance gains are to be expected. [1] https://github.com/iefserge/eshttp [2] https://github.com/raadad/node-lwan [3] http://lwan.ws/ [4] https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r12&hw=...
In Node 5.7.0 (stable) released

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.