HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
iliasam
OpenTOFLidar
C2020–2020
iliasam / OpenTOFLidar

OpenTOFLidar

Open Source TOF Lidar

2Distinct people
4Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
877GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Open Source TOF Lidar

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by 3-hour interval4 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2020-03-11 09:54:42 UTC to 2020-03-12 17:29:10 UTC.

0122020-03-11 09:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-11 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsMar 11, 09:002020-03-11 12:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-11 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-11 15:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-11 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-11 18:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-11 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-11 21:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-12 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsMar 12, 00:002020-03-12 03:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-12 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-12 06:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-12 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2020-03-12 09:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-12 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-12 12:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-12 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-03-12 15:00:00 UTC to 2020-03-12 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMar 12, 15:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Mar 11, 09:002020-03-11 09:00:00 UTC2020-03-11 12:00:00 UTC110
Mar 11, 12:002020-03-11 12:00:00 UTC2020-03-11 15:00:00 UTC000
Mar 11, 15:002020-03-11 15:00:00 UTC2020-03-11 18:00:00 UTC000
Mar 11, 18:002020-03-11 18:00:00 UTC2020-03-11 21:00:00 UTC000
Mar 11, 21:002020-03-11 21:00:00 UTC2020-03-12 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 12, 00:002020-03-12 00:00:00 UTC2020-03-12 03:00:00 UTC000
Mar 12, 03:002020-03-12 03:00:00 UTC2020-03-12 06:00:00 UTC000
Mar 12, 06:002020-03-12 06:00:00 UTC2020-03-12 09:00:00 UTC202
Mar 12, 09:002020-03-12 09:00:00 UTC2020-03-12 12:00:00 UTC000
Mar 12, 12:002020-03-12 12:00:00 UTC2020-03-12 15:00:00 UTC000
Mar 12, 15:002020-03-12 15:00:00 UTC2020-03-12 18:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

4 sources
> "What is the limiting factor on the precision" Precision in this project is limited by rise time of the received signal. Meanwhile, this time is limited by rise time of laser's current. It is too long now - 10 ns. Theoretical TDC resolution is ~13mm per BIN. You could see real results here: https://github.com/iliasam/OpenTOFLidar/wiki/Resolution-of-t... > "How did you calculate the appropriate laser lens and standoff" I can't say that there was too much calculations. The is some information here: http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/tiduc73b/tiduc73b.pdf (part 2.3.5) and here: http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/tiducm1b/tiducm1b.pdf (part 2.3.2) Laser's lens should have maximum possible focal length, but it must not crop light beam from the diode. Photodiode's lens should have maximum Entrance pupil > "Is the CS mount lens's focal length important, or is the
Read the rest
re no need for a sharp image at all distances?" You need to have sharp image at big distances. At short distances it is not important - light signal is high enough. > "Why use one CS-mount lens and one M12 lens, rather than two M12 lenses?" I think that it is easier to find lens with big "Entrance pupil" with CS mount that with M12 mount. Bigger mount - bigger lens diameter, bigger "Entrance pupil". > "Do you need any sort of dynamic gain" I don't have any kind of electrical gain control. There is an ability to change APD gain, but I don't use it. > "optical filtering on the received signal" I don't have filter in my LIDAR, but it is necessary to have it if you are going to run LIDAR at sunlight. I give links to a several interference filters in "LidarTotalBOM.xlsx". > "Did you need much fancy $$$$ test equipment to get the design working". All that I have is Tektronix TDS540D oscilloscope (bought at the Ebay for $300) and multimeter.
In Open Source Time-of-Flight DIY Lidar

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.