HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
Infisical
agent-vault
Go2026–2026
Infisical / agent-vault

agent-vault

A HTTP credential proxy and vault for AI agents like Claude Code, OpenClaw, Hermes, custom agents + harnesses, and more.

3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
2.5KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A HTTP credential proxy and vault for AI agents like Claude Code, OpenClaw, Hermes, custom agents + harnesses, and more.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2026-04-22 16:25:28 UTC to 2026-07-23 17:20:00 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

012026-04-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsApr 202026-04-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-05-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-05-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-05-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-05-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-05-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-05-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-05-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-05-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-06-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJun 12026-06-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-06-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2026-06-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-06-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-06-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-06-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-06-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-07-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-07-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-07-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJul 20

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Apr 202026-04-20 00:00:00 UTC2026-04-27 00:00:00 UTC110
Apr 272026-04-27 00:00:00 UTC2026-05-04 00:00:00 UTC000
May 42026-05-04 00:00:00 UTC2026-05-11 00:00:00 UTC000
May 112026-05-11 00:00:00 UTC2026-05-18 00:00:00 UTC000
May 182026-05-18 00:00:00 UTC2026-05-25 00:00:00 UTC000
May 252026-05-25 00:00:00 UTC2026-06-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 12026-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-06-08 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 82026-06-08 00:00:00 UTC2026-06-15 00:00:00 UTC101
Jun 152026-06-15 00:00:00 UTC2026-06-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 222026-06-22 00:00:00 UTC2026-06-29 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 292026-06-29 00:00:00 UTC2026-07-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 62026-07-06 00:00:00 UTC2026-07-13 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 132026-07-13 00:00:00 UTC2026-07-20 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 202026-07-20 00:00:00 UTC2026-07-27 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

3 sources
I think this sounds very cool! It sounds similar to Agent Vault (github.com/Infisical/agent-vault) but with an added feature of having security policies for denial/human-in-the-loop of traffic based on the contents of requests? The nice thing about Agent Vault is the encryption of credentials and other ways they handle making sure those don't leak from storage. I suppose you could potentially wrap the two in layers as well (agent -> Claw Patrol -> Agent Vault -> external network) EDIT: looking at some of the comments, it sounds like Claw Patrol can work with protocols beyond HTTP/S, so potentially covers more surface area than AV
In Show HN: Claw Patrol, a security firewall for agents

Show HN: Agent Vault – Open-source credential proxy and vault for agents

Hey HN! Today we're launching Agent Vault - an open source HTTP credential proxy and vault for AI agents. Repo is at https://github.com/Infisical/agent-vault, and there's an in-depth description at https://infisical.com/blog/agent-vault-the-open-source-crede.... We built Agent Vault in response to a question that been plaguing the industry: How do we give agents secure access to services without them reading any secrets? Most teams building agents have run into this exact problem: They build an agent or agentic system and come to realize at some point that it needs credentials in order to access any services. The issue is that agents, unlike traditional workloads, are non-deterministic, highly-prone to prompt injection, and thus can easily be manipulated to leaking the credentials that they need to operate. This is the problem of credenti
Read the rest
al exfiltration (not to be confused with data exfiltration). In response to this, some teams we've seen have implemented basic guardrails and security controls to mitigate this risk in their agentic environments including using short-lived access tokens. The more advanced teams have started to converge toward a pattern: credential brokering, the idea being to separate agents from their credentials through some form of egress proxy. In this model, the agent makes a request to a proxy that attaches a credential onto it and brokers it through to the target service. This proxy approach is actually used in Anthropic's Managed Agents architecture blog with it being that "the harness is never made aware of the credentials." We've seen similar credential brokering schemes come out from Vercel and in Cloudflare's latest Outbound Workers. Seeing all this made us think: What if we could create a portable credential brokering service plugged seamlessly into agents' existing workflows in an interface agnostic way, meaning that agents could continue to work with APIs, CLIs, SDKs, MCPs without interference and get the security of credential brokering. This led to Agent Vault - an open source HTTP credential proxy and vault that we're building for AI agents. You can deploy this as a dedicated service and set up your agent's environment to proxy requests through it. Note that in a full deployment, you do need to lock down the network so that all outbound traffic is forced through Agent Vault The Agent Vault (AV) implementation has a few interesting design decisions: - Local Forward Proxy: AV chooses an interface agnostic approach to credential brokering by following a MITM architecture using HTTPS_PROXY as an environment variable set in the agent's environment to redirect traffic through it; this also means that it runs its own CA whose certificate must be configured on the client's trust store. - MITM architecture: Since AV terminates TLS in order to do credential brokering its able to inspect traffic and apply rules to it before establishing a new TLS connection upstream. This makes it a great to be able to extend AV to incorporate firewall-like features to be applied at this proxy layer. - Portable: AV itself is a single Go binary that bundles a server and the CLI; it can be deployed as a Docker container as well. In practice, this means that you can self-host AV on your own infrastructure and it should work more universally than provider specific approaches like that of Vercel and Cloudflare. While the preliminary design of Agent Vault is a bit clunky to work with and we’d wished to have more time to smoothen the developer experience around it, particularly around the configuration setup for agents to start proxying requests through it, we figured it would be best to open source the technology and work with the community to make gradual improvements for it to work seamlessly across all agentic use cases since each has its own nuances. All in all, we believe credential brokering is the right next step for how secrets management should be done for agents and would love to hear your views, questions, feedback!
156 points · Open discussion

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.