HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
intel
dptf
C++2018–2018
intel / dptf · Archived

dptf

Discover this repository through its Hacker News conversations.

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
90GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A public description has not been verified.

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 12:54:37 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2018-09-26 23:58:20 UTC to 2018-09-27 03:09:36 UTC.

012018-09-26 23:00:00 UTC to 2018-09-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsSep 26, 23:002018-09-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-09-27 01:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-09-27 01:00:00 UTC to 2018-09-27 02:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsSep 27, 01:002018-09-27 02:00:00 UTC to 2018-09-27 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-09-27 03:00:00 UTC to 2018-09-27 04:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsSep 27, 03:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Sep 26, 23:002018-09-26 23:00:00 UTC2018-09-27 00:00:00 UTC101
Sep 27, 00:002018-09-27 00:00:00 UTC2018-09-27 01:00:00 UTC000
Sep 27, 01:002018-09-27 01:00:00 UTC2018-09-27 02:00:00 UTC000
Sep 27, 02:002018-09-27 02:00:00 UTC2018-09-27 03:00:00 UTC000
Sep 27, 03:002018-09-27 03:00:00 UTC2018-09-27 04:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
Wait, what? From reading the git repos a bit, it seems that Lenovo and Intel have created some framework that is, in its default state, modifying the thermal MSRs every five seconds via SMI (presumably). Let that sink in. Somehow, rather than letting the CPU run with reasonable parameters and letting the EC control fans as needed, they are forcing the system into SMM (which interrupts everything on all cores) to fiddle with thermal parameters. And they want some ridiculous user space library (DPTF) to reconfigure this mess to actually do something sensible. WTF edit: Wow, the Intel code in question is hilariously enterprisey. Check this out: https://github.com/intel/dptf/blob/master/DPTF/Sources/Polic... and that repo is full of files like SuchAndSuchFacadeInterface.h. I swear that at least 95% of the code doesn’t do anything. Maybe 99%.
In X1 Carbon 6th gen about 50% slower on Linux
That seems like only half of the story. Earlier in that thread, there's this quote from lenovo: " Due to "DPTF" function will act on Windows system by BIOS/Driver support, the system will turn to cool mode when keep high temperature several minutes. But Linux system didn't have driver support DPTF function, it only have TDP limit on platform. So user should have different between Windows and Linux system as normal behavior." So lenovo is doing something conservative because DPTF isn't officially supported on linux. There seems to be a DPTF repo here: https://github.com/intel/dptf
In X1 Carbon 6th gen about 50% slower on Linux

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.