HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
iotaledger-archive
legacy-wallet-use-trinity-wallet-instead
JavaScript2017–2018
iotaledger-archive / legacy-wallet-use-trinity-wallet-instead · Archived

legacy-wallet-use-trinity-wallet-instead

IOTA Wallet

6Distinct people
7Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
2KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

IOTA Wallet

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week7 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2017-12-17 07:56:22 UTC to 2018-02-28 08:23:22 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

01232017-12-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-12-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 commentsDec 112017-12-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-12-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2017-12-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJan 152018-01-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2018-02-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-03-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 commentsFeb 26

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Dec 112017-12-11 00:00:00 UTC2017-12-18 00:00:00 UTC303
Dec 182017-12-18 00:00:00 UTC2017-12-25 00:00:00 UTC101
Dec 252017-12-25 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 12018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-08 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 82018-01-08 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-15 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 152018-01-15 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 222018-01-22 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-29 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 292018-01-29 00:00:00 UTC2018-02-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 52018-02-05 00:00:00 UTC2018-02-12 00:00:00 UTC101
Feb 122018-02-12 00:00:00 UTC2018-02-19 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 192018-02-19 00:00:00 UTC2018-02-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 262018-02-26 00:00:00 UTC2018-03-05 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

7 sources
The most recent is exe is opensource--it's right there on the top of the git. In fact, he probably had to scroll past it to download v2.5.6 I looked: https://github.com/iotaledger/wallet/releases Also, a few user-friendly wallets are going to be released soon, but he chose to not wait? The whole thing smacks of deliberate attempt to fail. He couldn't have made worse choices--unless he had decided to wear a blindfold and rewrite the code.
In IOTA: Cannot be used for IoT, loss of funds may occur
Not really deep into this, and haven't even read the whitepaper, but looking from the outside there are a lot of red flags around this project: - Use of ternary logic [1] - Writing their own hash function [1] - Claiming that the flaws in the hash function were 'copy protection' [2] - The Github issues page for their wallet client [3] I've heard that the DAG approach has merit, but from what I've seen I would not trust this team to execute on it. [EDIT]: Almost forgot the black-box closed source 'central coordinator' [4] [1]: https://medium.com/@neha/cryptographic-vulnerabilities-in-io... [2]: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/Come-from-Beyond/a84ab861... [3]: https://github.com/iotaledger/wallet/issues [4]: https://www.reddit.com/r/Iota/comments/7c3qu8/coordinator_ex...
In Fog.sh – decentralized content publishing on the IOTA ledger
IOTA wallet is full of really bad bugs, just look how bad it is on first pages, the more pages you skip, the worse it is. It still doesn't work on Linux, for many users wallet crashes or shows green screen and nothing more. Doesn't work through Wine either. https://github.com/iotaledger/wallet/issues Issues on github have no responses from developers since early November and there were no commits since than, what's surprising, there were a lot of blog posts on their domain and many subreddits how great they are (!!??) BitFinex two week ago had problems paying out IOTAs, payouts were cancelled without any reason. Didn't try again since that time. A lot of domains explaining how to buy IOTA look dodgy, like they were made by 14yo in '90s. There are dozens of domains like supportiota, forumiota, iotasupport.com, howtobuyiota.co.uk ? Why do t
Read the rest
hey all exist and duplicate content? Watch out out there.
In IOTA: A tangled mess

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.