HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
isec-tugraz
ChromeZero
JavaScript2018–2018
isec-tugraz / ChromeZero

ChromeZero

Google Chrome extension implementing JavaScript Zero

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
151GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Google Chrome extension implementing JavaScript Zero

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2018-01-04 09:31:54 UTC to 2018-03-13 13:16:51 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

012018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsJan 12018-01-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsFeb 52018-02-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-03-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-03-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-03-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-03-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-03-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMar 12

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jan 12018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-08 00:00:00 UTC110
Jan 82018-01-08 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-15 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 152018-01-15 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 222018-01-22 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-29 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 292018-01-29 00:00:00 UTC2018-02-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 52018-02-05 00:00:00 UTC2018-02-12 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 122018-02-12 00:00:00 UTC2018-02-19 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 192018-02-19 00:00:00 UTC2018-02-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 262018-02-26 00:00:00 UTC2018-03-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 52018-03-05 00:00:00 UTC2018-03-12 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 122018-03-12 00:00:00 UTC2018-03-19 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
The idea is an extension to let users opt into javascript features that allow for side-channel attacks. Here's the source code: https://github.com/IAIK/ChromeZero Note this closed issue from karthikbhargavan pointing out some of the ways a malicious page could get access to unprotected javascript features: https://github.com/IAIK/ChromeZero/issues/2 misc0110 suggests those are implementation details, but I'm a little skeptical -- I bet it's pretty dang hard for a Chrome extension to close off every way to get access to a given function in javascript. So I think it's probably best to look at this as a user interface testbed -- basically a test of how annoying or effective it would be if browsers asked users to opt into these things, and which set of policies would be least annoying for the maximum protection. I suppose it also sets a ceili
Read the rest
ng on the performance impact, but it's not obvious the impact would be the same if the same rules were set at the browser level.
In JavaScript Zero: real JavaScript, and zero side-channel attacks

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.