HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
itchio
wharf
Go2022–2022
itchio / wharf

wharf

:satellite: A protocol to quickly transfer software builds (reference Go implementation)

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
193GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

:satellite: A protocol to quickly transfer software builds (reference Go implementation)

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2022-04-29 00:07:16 UTC to 2022-04-29 15:38:06 UTC.

012022-04-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-29 01:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsApr 29, 00:002022-04-29 01:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-29 02:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-04-29 02:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-29 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-04-29 03:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-29 04:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-04-29 04:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-29 05:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-04-29 05:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-29 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-04-29 06:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-29 07:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-04-29 07:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-29 08:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsApr 29, 07:002022-04-29 08:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-29 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-04-29 09:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-29 10:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-04-29 10:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-29 11:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-04-29 11:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-29 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-04-29 12:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-29 13:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-04-29 13:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-29 14:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-04-29 14:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-29 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-04-29 15:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-29 16:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsApr 29, 15:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Apr 29, 00:002022-04-29 00:00:00 UTC2022-04-29 01:00:00 UTC110
Apr 29, 01:002022-04-29 01:00:00 UTC2022-04-29 02:00:00 UTC000
Apr 29, 02:002022-04-29 02:00:00 UTC2022-04-29 03:00:00 UTC000
Apr 29, 03:002022-04-29 03:00:00 UTC2022-04-29 04:00:00 UTC000
Apr 29, 04:002022-04-29 04:00:00 UTC2022-04-29 05:00:00 UTC000
Apr 29, 05:002022-04-29 05:00:00 UTC2022-04-29 06:00:00 UTC000
Apr 29, 06:002022-04-29 06:00:00 UTC2022-04-29 07:00:00 UTC000
Apr 29, 07:002022-04-29 07:00:00 UTC2022-04-29 08:00:00 UTC000
Apr 29, 08:002022-04-29 08:00:00 UTC2022-04-29 09:00:00 UTC000
Apr 29, 09:002022-04-29 09:00:00 UTC2022-04-29 10:00:00 UTC000
Apr 29, 10:002022-04-29 10:00:00 UTC2022-04-29 11:00:00 UTC000
Apr 29, 11:002022-04-29 11:00:00 UTC2022-04-29 12:00:00 UTC000
Apr 29, 12:002022-04-29 12:00:00 UTC2022-04-29 13:00:00 UTC000
Apr 29, 13:002022-04-29 13:00:00 UTC2022-04-29 14:00:00 UTC000
Apr 29, 14:002022-04-29 14:00:00 UTC2022-04-29 15:00:00 UTC000
Apr 29, 15:002022-04-29 15:00:00 UTC2022-04-29 16:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
I use Go heavily cross-platform developing DataStation [0] and dsq [1]. I am not an expert. And I don't have proof for it but on some rudimentary benchmarks the Linux-specific file idioms in the Go standard library definitely don't seem to translate well to even macOS let alone Windows. For example some good streaming techniques for reading large files on Linux that work really well there seemed to be pretty bad on macOS. I think Amos has presented more proof than I can on the topic of just how Linux-influenced Go is. And I think it is fine for the majority of Go users because the majority users of Go are building server apps or Linux CLIs. Amos has spent some time building cross-platform desktop systems with Go for itch.io and I think I'm seeing some of the same things they are in that scenario. I think this is a reasonable article. I di
Read the rest
dn't notice anything too flame-y myself but if for you Amos gets flame-y at any point I think that's worth ignoring because there does seem to be something up with Go in cross-platform applications. Amos does have good experience here. (Go look at itchi.io's github like wharf [2] or butler [3] where they are/were the main contributor.) I like Go a lot and for most things I'd keep using it still. Just sharing some observations. [0] https://github.com/multiprocessio/datastation [1] https://github.com/multiprocessio/dsq [2] https://github.com/itchio/wharf [3] https://github.com/itchio/butler
In Lies we tell ourselves to keep using Golang

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.