HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
ityonemo
clr
Zig2025–2026
ityonemo / clr

clr

Checker for Lifetimes and other Refinement types

Explore on GitHubRead Hacker News discussions
10Distinct people
41Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
281GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Checker for Lifetimes and other Refinement types

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 9:01:12 PM UTC.

Why Zig over C for Systems Programming direct repository linkDebated

Participants debate whether Zig offers distinct advantages over C or if its benefits can be replicated through modern C tooling and discipline. Strong disagreement exists regarding the suitability of Zig for production systems due to its pre-1.0 status, limited developer resources, and recent critical bugs in library rewrites.

108 readable replies · Supporting reply 1 · Supporting reply 2 · Supporting reply 3 · Supporting reply 4

Mentions over time

HN mentions by month41 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2025-02-03 21:58:46 UTC to 2026-10-05 18:56:29 UTC.

02462025-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 1 submissions, 6 commentsFeb 20252025-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2025-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 commentsDec 20252026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2026-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2026-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments2026-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2026-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2026-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 1 submissions, 6 comments2026-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2026-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 commentsOct 2026

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Feb 20252025-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-03-01 00:00:00 UTC716
Mar 20252025-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Apr 20252025-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-05-01 00:00:00 UTC101
May 20252025-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Jun 20252025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-07-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Jul 20252025-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-08-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 20252025-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 20252025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-10-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 20252025-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-11-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 20252025-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-12-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 20252025-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC404
Jan 20262026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-02-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Feb 20262026-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-01 00:00:00 UTC303
Mar 20262026-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-04-01 00:00:00 UTC404
Apr 20262026-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-05-01 00:00:00 UTC000
May 20262026-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-06-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Jun 20262026-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-07-01 00:00:00 UTC303
Jul 20262026-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-08-01 00:00:00 UTC716
Aug 20262026-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-09-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 20262026-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-10-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Oct 20262026-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-11-01 00:00:00 UTC312

What Hacker News says

1 sources
ArtixFox·Jun 9, 2025
Im pretty sure valgrind and friends can be used in zig. Zig is still not 1.0, theres not much stability guarantees, making something like Frama-C, even tho it is possible is simply going to be soo much pain due to constant breakages as compared to something like C. But it is not impossible and there have been demos of refinement type checkers https://github.com/ityonemo/clr Beyond that, tools like antithesis https://antithesis.com/ exist that can be used for checking bugs. [ I dont have any experience with it. ]
In Self-hosted x86 back end is now default in debug mode

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.