plane

d through Docker’s API, collectors for it already exist for various sinks. We will soon be sending some time series metrics over NATS to use internally for scheduling, but the Docker API will be better for external consumption because the collector ecosystem is already robust. Resource caps can be defined at “spawn time”. They are not expected to have similar consumption, but the scheduler is not yet very smart, our approach currently is admittedly to overprovision. The scheduler is a big Q4 priority for us. Draining currently involves terminating the “agent” process on the node, which stops the drone from advertising itself to the controller. Traffic still gets routed to backends running on that drone. We have an open issue[1] to implement a message to do this automatically. [1] https://github.com/drifting-in-space/plane/issues/129

ch helped us reduce cold start times significantly. There are other things we gain from it, some of which I’ve talked about in this comment tree[2]. I will say, it seemed like a crazy decision when I proposed it, but I have no regrets about it. The point of sqlite was to allow the “drone” version to be updated in place without killing running backends. It also allows (but does not require) the components of the drone to run as separate containers. I originally wanted to use LMDB, but landed on sqlite. It’s a pretty lightweight dependency, it provides another point of introspection for a running system (the sqlite cli), and it’s not something people otherwise have to interact with. I wrote up my thought process for it at the time in this design doc[3]. You’re right about shared backends among multiple users being supported by Plane. I use per-user to convey that we treat container creation as so cheap and ephemeral you could give one to every user, but users can certainly share one and we’ve done that for exactly the data sync use case you describe. [1] https://github.com/drifting-in-space/plane/tree/original-kub... [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32305234 [3] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CSoF5Fgge_t1vY0rKQX--dWu...

ets their own server instance. I realized that something like this was needed while working on data-intensive tools at a hedge fund. I noticed that almost all new application software, whether it was built in-house or third-party SaaS, was delivered as a browser application rather than native. Although browsers are more powerful than ever, I knew from experience that industrial-scale data-heavy apps posed problems, because neither the browser or a traditional stateless server architecture could provide the compute resources needed for low-latency interaction with large datasets. I began talking about this with my friend Taylor, who had encountered similar limitations while working on data analysis and visualization tools at Datadog and Uber. We decided to team up and build a company around solving it. We have two products, an open source package and a managed platform. Spawner, the open source part, provides an API for web apps to spawn a session-lived process. It manages the process’s lifecycle, exposing it over HTTPS, tracking inbound connections, and shutting it down when it becomes idle (i.e. when the user closes their tab). It’s open source (MIT) and available at https://github.com/drifting-in-space/spawner. Jamsocket is our managed platform, which uses Spawner internally. It provides the same API, but frees you from having to deal with any cluster or network configuration to ship code. From an app developer’s point of view, using it is similar to using platforms like Netlify or Render. You stay in the web stack and never have to touch Kubernetes. Here's an example. Imagine you make an application for investigating fraud in a large transaction database. Users want to interactively filter, aggregate, and visualize gigabytes of transactions as a graph. Instead of sending all of the data down to the browser and doing the work there, you would put your code in a container and upload it to our platform. Then, whenever a fraud analyst opens your application, you hit an API we provide to spin up a dedicated backend for that analyst. Your browser code then opens a WebSocket connection directly to that backend, which it uses to stream data as the analyst applies filters or zooms/pans the visualization. We're different from most managed platforms because we give each user a dedicated process. That said, there are a few other services that do run long-lived processes for each user. Architecturally, we're most similar to Agones. Agones is targeted at games where the client can speak UDP to an arbitrary IP; we target applications that want to connect directly from browsers to a hostname over HTTPS. In the Erlang world, the OTP stack provides similar functionality, but you have to embrace Erlang/Elixir to get the benefits of it; we are entirely language-agnostic. Cloudflare Durable Objects support a form of long-lived processes, but are focused on use cases around program state synchronization rather than arbitrary high-compute/memory use cases. We have a usage-based billing model, similar to Heroku. We charge you for the compute you use and take a cut. Usage billing scales to zero, so it’s approachable for weekend experiments. We have not solidified a price plan yet, but we’re aiming to provide an instance capable of running VS Code (as an example) for about 10 cents an hour, fractionally metered. High-memory and high-CPU backends will cost more, and heavy users will get volume discounts. Our target customers are desktop-like SaaS apps and internal data tools. As mentioned, our core API is open source and available at https://github.com/drifting-in-space/spawner. The managed platform is in beta and we’re currently onboarding users from a waitlist, to make sure that we have the server capacity to scale. If you’re interested, you’re welcome to sign up for it here: https://driftingin.space. Have you built a similar infrastructure for your application? We’re interested in hearing the approaches people have already taken to this problem and what the pain points are.