HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
JavaJens
TextSecure
C2015–2015
JavaJens / TextSecure

TextSecure

A secure text messaging application for Android.

4Distinct people
4Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
72GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A secure text messaging application for Android.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week4 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-06-24 19:15:36 UTC to 2015-11-20 17:18:47 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

0122015-06-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 commentsJun 222015-06-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-08-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-08-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-08-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-08-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-08-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-08-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-08-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-08-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-08-31 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-08-31 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsAug 312015-09-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-11-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-11-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-11-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2015-11-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-11-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-11-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-11-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsNov 16

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jun 222015-06-22 00:00:00 UTC2015-06-29 00:00:00 UTC202
Jun 292015-06-29 00:00:00 UTC2015-07-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 62015-07-06 00:00:00 UTC2015-07-13 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 132015-07-13 00:00:00 UTC2015-07-20 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 202015-07-20 00:00:00 UTC2015-07-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 272015-07-27 00:00:00 UTC2015-08-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 32015-08-03 00:00:00 UTC2015-08-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 102015-08-10 00:00:00 UTC2015-08-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 172015-08-17 00:00:00 UTC2015-08-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 242015-08-24 00:00:00 UTC2015-08-31 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 312015-08-31 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 72015-09-07 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-14 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 142015-09-14 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 212015-09-21 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 282015-09-28 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 52015-10-05 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-12 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 122015-10-12 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-19 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 192015-10-19 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 262015-10-26 00:00:00 UTC2015-11-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 22015-11-02 00:00:00 UTC2015-11-09 00:00:00 UTC101
Nov 92015-11-09 00:00:00 UTC2015-11-16 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 162015-11-16 00:00:00 UTC2015-11-23 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

4 sources
I'm using Cyanogenmod and I wanted to try TextSecure. There is a version for SMS pre-installed, but I'm not a fan of paying money for 128 bytes of data. I don't have any Google Services installed. So I tried finding it on F-Droid, but it wasn't there. I found out there has been a lot of discussion about this. [0][1] I decided to compile it on my own. That requires to use use Google Libraries, oh well. I managed to get that done and was disappointed when I tried to use it. It also requires to have Google Services installed on your phone for push notifications. I don't have that. I tried finding a solution, and other people complained about this and there was the idea to use websockets instead of google push notifications [3]. Someone forked TextSecure and started working on it [4]. Unfortunately that fork isn't stable yet, and it doesn't c
Read the rest
ommunicate with 'producion' users of TextSecure [5]. This is where I gave up. It shouldn't be so hard to install a free app on a free system. Also, the websocket fork is somewhat dead [6]. 0: https://f-droid.org/posts/security-notice-textsecure/ 1: https://github.com/WhisperSystems/TextSecure/issues/127 3: https://github.com/WhisperSystems/TextSecure/issues/1000 4: https://github.com/JavaJens/TextSecure 5: https://github.com/JavaJens/TextSecure/issues/10 6: https://github.com/JavaJens/TextSecure/issues/15
In Telegram Bot Platform
Just yesterday I was trying to get a bot working on the TextSecure platform. A vastly disappointing experience: almost not existing libraries, sparse and incomplete documentation, unstable protocol breaking without any kind of notice (https://github.com/JavaJens/TextSecure/issues/6, for example). And still no way to register without a phone, which would be amazing for this kind of project: https://github.com/WhisperSystems/TextSecure/issues/1085 I think Telegram is succeeding in what TextSecure is failing: attracting a widespread community of developers. This is only a confirmation, in my opinion. EDIT: and, by the way, while Telegram security is no good, I wonder why we cannot have both (security & developer-friendliness)
In Telegram Bot Platform

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.