HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
jdalton
fusejs
HISTORICAL RECORD2010–2010
jdalton / fusejs · Not publicly available

fusejs

Discover this repository through its Hacker News conversations.

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A public description has not been verified.

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:03:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by 6-hour interval2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2010-02-01 14:23:46 UTC to 2010-02-05 23:25:43 UTC.

012010-02-01 12:00:00 UTC to 2010-02-01 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsFeb 1, 12:002010-02-01 18:00:00 UTC to 2010-02-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-02-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-02-02 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-02-02 06:00:00 UTC to 2010-02-02 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-02-02 12:00:00 UTC to 2010-02-02 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-02-02 18:00:00 UTC to 2010-02-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-02-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-02-03 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-02-03 06:00:00 UTC to 2010-02-03 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-02-03 12:00:00 UTC to 2010-02-03 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsFeb 3, 12:002010-02-03 18:00:00 UTC to 2010-02-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-02-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-02-04 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-02-04 06:00:00 UTC to 2010-02-04 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-02-04 12:00:00 UTC to 2010-02-04 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-02-04 18:00:00 UTC to 2010-02-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-02-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2010-02-05 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-02-05 06:00:00 UTC to 2010-02-05 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-02-05 12:00:00 UTC to 2010-02-05 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2010-02-05 18:00:00 UTC to 2010-02-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsFeb 5, 18:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Feb 1, 12:002010-02-01 12:00:00 UTC2010-02-01 18:00:00 UTC110
Feb 1, 18:002010-02-01 18:00:00 UTC2010-02-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 2, 00:002010-02-02 00:00:00 UTC2010-02-02 06:00:00 UTC000
Feb 2, 06:002010-02-02 06:00:00 UTC2010-02-02 12:00:00 UTC000
Feb 2, 12:002010-02-02 12:00:00 UTC2010-02-02 18:00:00 UTC000
Feb 2, 18:002010-02-02 18:00:00 UTC2010-02-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 3, 00:002010-02-03 00:00:00 UTC2010-02-03 06:00:00 UTC000
Feb 3, 06:002010-02-03 06:00:00 UTC2010-02-03 12:00:00 UTC000
Feb 3, 12:002010-02-03 12:00:00 UTC2010-02-03 18:00:00 UTC000
Feb 3, 18:002010-02-03 18:00:00 UTC2010-02-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 4, 00:002010-02-04 00:00:00 UTC2010-02-04 06:00:00 UTC000
Feb 4, 06:002010-02-04 06:00:00 UTC2010-02-04 12:00:00 UTC000
Feb 4, 12:002010-02-04 12:00:00 UTC2010-02-04 18:00:00 UTC000
Feb 4, 18:002010-02-04 18:00:00 UTC2010-02-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 5, 00:002010-02-05 00:00:00 UTC2010-02-05 06:00:00 UTC000
Feb 5, 06:002010-02-05 06:00:00 UTC2010-02-05 12:00:00 UTC000
Feb 5, 12:002010-02-05 12:00:00 UTC2010-02-05 18:00:00 UTC000
Feb 5, 18:002010-02-05 18:00:00 UTC2010-02-06 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
I don't understand. WHY do you want to use one main function or class? Why not break things up into modules, classes, and functions similar to the way you do in C#? Look at the source code of any well-written JavaScript library or app and you will find quite a bit of modularity. Some examples, from small to large: http://osteele.com/sources/javascript/functional/functional.... http://github.com/jdalton/fusejs/tree/master/src/ http://github.com/aptana/activejs/tree/master/src/active_rec... It makes sense to use one global object as a namespace, but within this namespace you can have as many classes, objects, and functions as you like. Look at the source of jQuery, for example: http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.4.1.js Even if you have a single class, you can define that classes' members across many different files. You can concatenate al
Read the rest
l the files together at build- or deployment-time (for performance reasons) but keep them separate in your source tree. For example, the jQuery source code I linked above is actually a concatenation of half a dozen different source files. Just use the "module pattern" to wrap each file in an anonymous function, and have it export its public interfaces to objects/classes in your single global namespace: http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/2007/06/12/module-pattern/
In Ask HN: How do you deal with Big JavaScript files?

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.