HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
jeff-regier
Celeste.jl
Jupyter Notebook2017–2020
jeff-regier / Celeste.jl

Celeste.jl

Scalable inference for a generative model of astronomical images

3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
187GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Scalable inference for a generative model of astronomical images

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2017-06-22 13:56:22 UTC to 2020-10-11 18:55:05 UTC.

012017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20172018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20182019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2020

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

3 sources
I see what you mean, but from my perspective what this argument is missing is the context that a large and important subset of the scientific community has never moved to Python to begin with. In other words, there is an even crankier and older community for which Julia may be the first actual change in a very long time. This is particularly the case in HPC, where everyone still uses Fortran, C, or C++, and has never moved nor ever will move to Python because Python is fundamentally unsuited to these workloads. But in some cases, Julia is [1]. The best differential equation solvers (e.g., SUNDIALS [2] for a modern example) have been written in FORTRAN for the last 50 years. If Julia can challenge Fortran as the go-to language for this type of work (e.g. DifferentialEquations.jl [3] and SciML), that would hardly count as excessive churn. [
Read the rest
In CSV Reader Benchmarks: Julia Reads CSVs 10-20x Faster than Python and R
I don't feel qualified to speculate on the implications for astronomy because that's not my field. However, Celeste is indeed a generative model and you can draw an image sample from the Celeste model and compare it to the original (there's a few examples in the Celeste issue tracker - https://github.com/jeff-regier/Celeste.jl/issues/625 is one I found on a quick look but there's more), so I think it qualifies in that sense. Of course you may want a more sophisticated model than Celeste for a complete model of the sky.
In Parallel Supercomputing for Astronomy with Julia
This is totally fair. Even the Julia creators regularly mention "stay with existing tools for now, if you are happy." Julia is an increasingly attractive option for greenfield, high-performance development, but for folks who aren't doing a lot of that, a more stable language and mature ecosystem is obviously important. Julia and many libraries can still require some elbow-grease, and the maturity and coverage varies between fields. However, this is rapidly changing as folks do new research in Julia and build up everything else they need along the way. The current situation is very similar to SciPy in the mid-2000s, though with perhaps a somewhat different mix of backgrounds. Here are a few examples: https://github.com/JuliaOpt https://github.com/jeff-regier/Celeste.jl https://github.com/dlfivefifty https://github.com/JuliaInv http://docs.
Read the rest
juliadiffeq.org/latest/ https://github.com/denizyuret/Knet.jl http://nemocas.org/ https://juliaplots.github.io/ So, hopefully you'll have reason to take another look in a few years. The most important thing, to me, is that all of these communities want more open, reproducible, and accessible science. There is plenty of room for growth, because users of closed-source software still probably outnumber py/r/jl by 5:1 or more.
In Julia Computing Raises $4.6M in Seed Funding

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.