HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
jewel
clearskies-ruby
Ruby2014–2014
jewel / clearskies-ruby

clearskies-ruby

Clearskies Protocol proof-of-concept

Explore on GitHubRead Hacker News discussions
2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
12GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Clearskies Protocol proof-of-concept

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:03:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by day2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2014-04-01 09:21:45 UTC to 2014-04-10 14:41:01 UTC.

012014-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-04-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsApr 12014-04-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-04-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-04-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-04-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-04-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-04-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-04-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-04-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsApr 52014-04-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-04-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-04-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-04-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-04-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-04-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-04-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-04-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-04-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-04-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsApr 10

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Apr 12014-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-04-02 00:00:00 UTC101
Apr 22014-04-02 00:00:00 UTC2014-04-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 32014-04-03 00:00:00 UTC2014-04-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 42014-04-04 00:00:00 UTC2014-04-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 52014-04-05 00:00:00 UTC2014-04-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 62014-04-06 00:00:00 UTC2014-04-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 72014-04-07 00:00:00 UTC2014-04-08 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 82014-04-08 00:00:00 UTC2014-04-09 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 92014-04-09 00:00:00 UTC2014-04-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 102014-04-10 00:00:00 UTC2014-04-11 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
pedrocr·Apr 10, 2014
As far as I know the current contenders are git-annex[1], syncthing[2] and clearskies[3]. They're all still very green. git-annex is technologically farthest along but is still very unpolished for the basic "sync this dir" functionality to be reliable/friendly. Clearskies is still at proof-of-concept stage, defining the protocol and implementing the first clients. syncthing is probably the best bet right now, but I haven't tested it yet. [1] http://git-annex.branchable.com/ [2] https://github.com/calmh/syncthing [3] https://github.com/jewel/clearskies-ruby
In Condoleezza Rice Joins Dropbox’s Board As It Names New CFO, COO

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.