HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
jj-vcs
jj
Rust2020–2026
jj-vcs / jj

jj

A Git-compatible VCS that is both simple and powerful

124Distinct people
241Mentions
2Explicit recommenders
32.5KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A Git-compatible VCS that is both simple and powerful

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

I ran into one thing with jj that I would say is pretty bad. I love it other than the way it bit me in this one case. I have a repo with some code that generates a credential…

dolni used a recommendation phrase. 2 indexed comments match. This is a phrase match, not a verdict.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

Our software engineering interviews are changing a little direct repository linkDebated

Commenters are divided on whether traditional coding interviews remain relevant in the age of LLMs, with some arguing that standard algorithmic problems have become obsolete signals while others propose new evaluation methods like live system design or code review. A significant portion of the discussion shifts to a technical dispute over whether testing candidates on Git operations and Pull Requests effectively measures version control proficiency or merely tests familiarity with specific platform UIs.

201 readable replies · Supporting reply 1 · Supporting reply 2 · Supporting reply 3 · Supporting reply 4

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year241 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2020-12-18 04:46:50 UTC to 2026-10-25 20:37:42 UTC.

0204060802020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments20202021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 39 mentions; 4 submissions, 35 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 43 mentions; 4 submissions, 39 comments20232024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 40 mentions; 3 submissions, 37 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 72 mentions; 12 submissions, 60 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 44 mentions; 19 submissions, 25 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC39435
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC43439
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC40337
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC721260
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC441925

From the project README

An excerpt from the repository, fetched Nov 13, 2026.

Read the project’s introduction
Jujutsu—a version control system Homepage   •   Installation   •   Getting Started   •   Development Roadmap   •   Contributing Introduction Jujutsu is a powerful version control system for software projects. You use it to get a copy of your code, track changes to the code, and finally publish those changes for others to see and use. It is designed from the ground up to be easy to use—whether you're new or experienced, working on brand new projects alone, or large scale software projects with large histories and teams. Jujutsu is unlike most other systems, because internally it abstracts the user interface and version control algorithms from the storage systems used to serve your content. This allows it to serve as a VCS with many possible physical backends, that may have their own data or networking models—like Mercurial or Breezy, or hybrid systems like Google's cloud-based design, Piper/CitC. Today, we use Git repositories as a storage layer to serve and track content, making it compatible with many of your favorite Git-based tools, right now! However, note that only commits and files are stored in Git; bookmarks (branches) and other higher-level metadata are stored in custom storage outside of Git. All core developers use Jujutsu to develop Jujutsu, right here on GitHub. But it should hopefully work with your favorite Git forges, too. We combine many distinct design choices and concepts from other version control systems into a single tool. Some of those sources of inspiration include: Git: We make an effort to be fast—with a snappy UX, efficient algorithms, correct data structures, and good-old-fashioned attention to detail. The default storage backend uses Git repositories for "physical storage", for wide interoperability and ease of onboarding. Mercurial & Sapling: There are many Mercurial-inspired features, such as the revset language to select commits. There is no explicit index or staging area. Branches are "anonymous" like Mercurial, so you don't need to make up a name for each small change. Primitives for rewriting history are powerful and simple. Formatting output is done with a robust template language that can be configured by the user. Darcs: Jujutsu keeps track of conflicts as first-class objects in its model; they are first-class in the same way commits are, while alternatives like Git simply think of conflicts as textual diffs. While not as rigorous as systems like Darcs (which is based on a formalized theory of patches, as opposed to snapshots), the effect is that many forms of conflict resolution can be performed and propagated automatically. And it adds several innovative, useful features of its own: Working-copy-as-a-commit: Changes to files are recorded automatically as normal commits, and amended on every subsequent change. This "snapshot" design simplifies the user-facing data model (commits are the only visible object), simplifies internal algorithms, and completely subsumes features like Git's stashes or the index/staging-area. Operation log & undo: Jujutsu records every operation that is performed on the repository, from commits, to pulls, to pushes. This makes debugging problems like "what just happened?" or "how did I end up here?" easier, especially when you're helping your coworker answer those questions about their repository! And because everything is recorded, you can undo that mistake you just made with ease. Version control has finally entered the 1960s! Automatic rebase and conflict resolution: When you modify a commit, every descendent is automatically rebased on top of the freshly-modified one. This makes "patch-based" workflows a breeze. If you resolve a conflict in a commit, the resolution of that conflict is also propagated through descendants as well. In effect, this is a completely transparent version of git rebase --update-refs combined with git rerere, supported by design. WarningThe following features are available for use, but experimental; they may have bugs, backwards incompatible storage changes, and user-interface changes! Safe, concurrent replication: Have you ever wanted to store your version controlled repositories inside a Dropbox folder? Or continuously backup repositories to S3? No? Well, now you can! The fundamental problem with using filesystems like Dropbox and backup tools like rsync on your typical Git/Mercurial repositories is that they rely on local filesystem operations being atomic, serialized, and non-concurrent with respect to other reads and writes—which is not true when operating on distributed file systems, or when operations like concurrent file copies (for backup) happen while lock files are being held. Jujutsu is instead designed to be safe under concurrent scenarios; simply using rsync or Dropbox and then using that resulting repository should never result in a repository in a corrupt state. The worst that should happen is that it will expose conflicts between the local and remote state, leaving you to resolve them. The command-line tool is called jj for now because it's easy to type and easy to replace (rare in English). The project is called "Jujutsu" because it matches "jj". Jujutsu is relatively young, with lots of work to still be done. If you have any questions, or want to talk about future plans, please join us on Discord , start a GitHub Discussion, or send an IRC message to #jujutsu on Libera Chat. The developers monitor all of these channels1. News and Updates 📣 December 2024: The jj Repository has moved to the jj-vcs GitHub organization. November 2024: Version 0.24 is released which adds jj file annotate, which is equivalent to git blame or hg annotate. September 2024: Martin gave a presentation about Jujutsu at Git Merge 2024. Feb 2024: Version 0.14 is released, which deprecates "jj checkout" and "jj merge", as well as jj init --git, which is now just called jj git init. Oct 2023: Version 0.10.0 is released! Now includes a bundled merge and diff editor for all platform
Read the full README on GitHub

What Hacker News says

241 sources
I apologize for what may come across as a bit of a cop-out answer. As many of you know, I'm a big fan of jj. The jj project used to have a comparison to Pijul for informational purposes, but the Pijul folks took offense, and so it was removed: https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/commit/0525dc9d860a5fff6a97d134... As such, I generally just decline to comment on Pijul, as I want to be respectful of them. As the linked commit says, it's not super clear what exactly they do not like, and so I don't want to accidentally cross some line. In general I wish the project well, seeing a new VCS in Rust is very cool.
In Redesigning source control at Anthropic
We (East River Source Control) don't run Jujutsu, it does not "belong" to us -- it is a community project! Nothing has or is changed. Most of the contributors have nothing to do with us/Google/whoever. We get tons of great contributions from highly experienced and talented individuals. It's healthy, check it out: https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/commits/main/ Most of the maintainer stuff is also overhyped in a way (OSS maintainer-heads know this). The maintainer group is largely structured to just keep things moving; not really a privilege but a responsibility -- making sure things get merged, doing technical reviews, ensure builds are unstuck, and hitting the green approval button. Our own community members also do code review, find bugs, triage things, answer questions, design features, help get users unstuck, etc. We are very much not alon
Read the rest
e, and I have great confidence in the constitution and strength of the community itself as someone who has been around the block a few times. This is going to sound silly and "guy approves of himself" adjacent, but I've been doing OSS maintainer stuff for like 2 decades at this point, and jj is truly a gem as a project. It is vibrant, and the community is generally speaking insanely talented (huge number of git powerusers), and we have a weird dogfood advantage where people use the tool to contribute right back to it. Martin did an awesome job setting the tone of the project just through his behavior before many of us joined years ago. He's a naturally good project lead. As I said elsewhere: I work for ERSC and I am a Jujutsu maintainer. This is just me speaking candidly on my own behalf.
In The creator of Jujutsu has joined ERSC
That's how GitHub discussion works :- ) (or did you know?) Look here: https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/discussions/ — by default, sorted by last activity. But you can also sort by newest, or by votes. For comment threads, look at e.g.: https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/discussions/5509?sort=old — sorted by time, by default. But you can also sort by upvotes. *** The forum software I'm developing, https://www.Talkyard.io, is also threaded, and can sort by time or by votes. (Both discussion topics and replies.) F.ex. go here: https://forum.talkyard.io/-9qb49/solving-problem-first-comme... and scroll down to the replies section and click `Oldest first` to change order. In addition to oldest/newest/"best", you can sort top level comments by time descending, and deeper comments by time _ascending_ or by votes — creating a kind of "micro blog feed" wher
Read the rest
e each top level comment is the most recent "micro blog post" — but replies don't have to share the same sort order. "Newest, then popular" and "Newest, then oldest" I call these sort orders. Also click the "Recent posts" in the upper right corner, to see the most recent comments sorted by time descending. *** Anyway. There's people who think the hybrid approach you mentioned is an good idea.
In Bring back crappy forums

Showing the 15 most recent of 241 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.