HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
JohnLaw2
btc-iids
OPEN SOURCE2021–2021
JohnLaw2 / btc-iids

btc-iids

Discover this repository through its Hacker News conversations.

3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
18GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A public description has not been verified.

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by day3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2021-09-18 09:27:35 UTC to 2021-10-13 16:42:32 UTC.

012021-09-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsSep 182021-09-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2021-09-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsSep 302021-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-10-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-10-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-10-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-10-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-10-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-10-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-10-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-10-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-10-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-10-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-10-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-10-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-10-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-10-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-10-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-10-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-10-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-10-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-10-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-10-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-10-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-10-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-10-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-10-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-10-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsOct 13

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Sep 182021-09-18 00:00:00 UTC2021-09-19 00:00:00 UTC110
Sep 192021-09-19 00:00:00 UTC2021-09-20 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 202021-09-20 00:00:00 UTC2021-09-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 212021-09-21 00:00:00 UTC2021-09-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 222021-09-22 00:00:00 UTC2021-09-23 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 232021-09-23 00:00:00 UTC2021-09-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 242021-09-24 00:00:00 UTC2021-09-25 00:00:00 UTC101
Sep 252021-09-25 00:00:00 UTC2021-09-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 262021-09-26 00:00:00 UTC2021-09-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 272021-09-27 00:00:00 UTC2021-09-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 282021-09-28 00:00:00 UTC2021-09-29 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 292021-09-29 00:00:00 UTC2021-09-30 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 302021-09-30 00:00:00 UTC2021-10-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 12021-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-10-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 22021-10-02 00:00:00 UTC2021-10-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 32021-10-03 00:00:00 UTC2021-10-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 42021-10-04 00:00:00 UTC2021-10-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 52021-10-05 00:00:00 UTC2021-10-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 62021-10-06 00:00:00 UTC2021-10-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 72021-10-07 00:00:00 UTC2021-10-08 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 82021-10-08 00:00:00 UTC2021-10-09 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 92021-10-09 00:00:00 UTC2021-10-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 102021-10-10 00:00:00 UTC2021-10-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 112021-10-11 00:00:00 UTC2021-10-12 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 122021-10-12 00:00:00 UTC2021-10-13 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 132021-10-13 00:00:00 UTC2021-10-14 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

3 sources
I'll second looking into layer 2 projects. Most of the new blockchains constantly being spun up are little more than schemes to make the founders rich. Even if the stacks are technically cleaner and nicer to work with, it's really hard to imagine any new blockchain bringing anything significant enough to the table to overcome network effects of established leaders. Specifically be wary of coins like Solana, Cardano, and maybe even Ethereum, which Gary Gensler of the SEC has indicated are probably all unregistered securities and he looks to be gearing up to come after them. I'm in the bitcoin only, simple, rock solid foundation with complexity built in higher layers camp, so I'll mention a couple of interesting things going on. The taproot softfork was recently approved by the network and will go live on mainnet next month. Read up here, h
Read the rest
ttps://blog.keys.casa/what-is-taproot-bitcoin-upgrade/. The lightning network is starting to get some real momentum after years of development. People are using it in unexpected ways, like building an e2e encrypted chat network (https://sphinx.chat/) that piggybacks on the network, or the LNURL-auth protocol (https://xn--57h.bigsun.xyz/lnurl-auth.html) that allows websites to provide persistent user accounts that are authenticated with a user's lightning wallet and require no other personal information. There's recently been some proposals (e.g. https://github.com/JohnLaw2/btc-iids/blob/main/iids14.pdf) to do some magic to stuff a truly massive amount of scaling within the limited bitcoin blocksize. Protocol changes needed for trustless drivechains/sidechains seems to be gaining traction, https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0300.mediawi.... The Rootstock sidechain will potentially bring the ethereum virtual machine to bitcoin as a sidechain. I know Ethereum also has some interesting layer 2 work, but I'm not as familiar with what's happening since I don't personally buy into the fat, complex base layer approach, the much more centralized nature of the network and development, nor the planned transition to proof of stake.
In Facebook's Novi wallet hits trouble as two top engineers depart

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.