HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
jonas
tig
C2013–2026
jonas / tig

tig

Text-mode interface for git

44Distinct people
47Mentions
2Explicit recommenders
13.4KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Text-mode interface for git

GitHub

Where it is used

The source check is incomplete. Verified examples will appear here.

What people are saying

For people interested in magit-like features, but don’t use Emacs, I highly recommend tig (https://github.com/jonas/tig). Here’s a tweet with a quick video with me using it…

robenkleene used a recommendation phrase. 2 indexed comments match. This is a phrase match, not a verdict.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 10:02:05 AM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year47 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2013-06-07 09:08:15 UTC to 2026-04-02 11:34:14 UTC.

02468102013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20132014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 1 submissions, 4 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 0 submissions, 8 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 10 mentions; 0 submissions, 10 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 6 mentions; 1 submissions, 5 comments20192020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 1 submissions, 6 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC514
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC808
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC10010
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC615
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC716
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

From the project README

An excerpt from the repository, fetched Nov 12, 2026.

Read the project’s introduction
Tig: text-mode interface for Git What is Tig? Tig is an ncurses-based text-mode interface for git. It functions mainly as a Git repository browser, but can also assist in staging changes for commit at chunk level and act as a pager for output from various Git commands. Resources Homepage: https://github.com/jonas/tig Manual: https://www.mankier.com/7/tigmanual Tarballs: https://github.com/jonas/tig/releases Q&A: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/tig Bugs and Feature Requests Bugs and feature requests can be reported using the issue tracker or by mail to the Git mailing list. Ensure that the word "tig" is in the subject. For other Tig related questions please use Stack Overflow: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/tig. If you are sending a bug report, please include the following information: What Tig and ncurses versions are you using? (tig -v) What system do you have? (uname -a, lsb_release -a) What Git version are you using? (git -v) Installation and News Information on how to build and install Tig are found in the installation instructions. News about releases and latest features and bug fixes are found in the release notes.
Read the full README on GitHub

What Hacker News says

8 sources
I'd like to also point out tig. "Tig is an ncurses-based text-mode interface for git" It doesn't have all the bells and whistles of a GUI, but if you need to look at all the branches, and commits to a repository. tig is an excellent tool. tig doesn't issue any commands though, its only a browser, you'll still need to know the CLI. (essentially a ncurses version of gitk) I'm normally in a ssh session on a remote box where my compile & run cycles happen. tig is curses based, so no X11 needed, filled in a really nice itch of mine. [1] https://github.com/jonas/tig
In Oh shit, git: Getting myself out of bad situations
No one's perfect with this stuff. If you don't believe me, clone git itself ($ git clone https://github.com/git/git) and open up the repo in tig(1) https://github.com/jonas/tig To be honest, I only in the past 2 years even bothered to view ($ git log --graph). Regardless of --graph getting wide now and then, I always visualize my git history as a straight line. Also, sometimes having a non-linear history is inevitable. Especially in large open source projects where you're pulling in patches to a branch, and patches on top of that. You're not always going to be merging a branch with a single author straight onto master. Despite posts like this (http://www.bitsnbites.eu/a-tidy-linear-git-history/) encouraging good git hygiene, I've had multiple open source projects merge in code via GitHub and never had negative consequence for it :P Maybe
Read the rest
there are corner cases where git bisect wouldn't work? Though I never used git bisect even once. Most I do is scroll through tig and view diffs. Also used to play with a cool git plugin in vim (https://github.com/tpope/vim-fugitive). Also, GitHub has (since that linear git history post) introduced Rebase + Merge https://github.com/blog/2243-rebase-and-merge-pull-requests. I think that'll get you what you want. I do keep branches ("pull requests" if you're using GH lingo) up to date with ($ git pull --rebase). That does mean a force push ($ git push --force), but it's ok if it's your personal branch. I also use interactive mode ($ git rebase -i <sha>) to edit/blend multiple commits. Also, when I do merge, if I go through CLI, I'll preserve the history of the branch by not doing fast forwards ($ git merge <branch> --no-ff).
In Git: Using Advanced Rebase Features for a Clean Repository
Did you try tig [1]? I prefer the command line solution to shoving complicated things and UI (which fugitive is -- I could barely remmeber all the features I had and like you, I only really ever used the :Gblame command the most) into vim. I prefer to have vim be lightweight and let other tools do their job (i.e the UNIX way). I don't use fugitive now but I do make full use of tig. In my .vimrc I have: nnoremap <leader>gb :echo system("git rev-parse --abbrev-ref @ <bar> tr -d '\n'")<CR> nnoremap <leader>go :silent !tig<CR>:silent redraw!<CR> nnoremap <leader>gB :silent !tig blame % +<C-r>=expand(line('.'))<CR><CR>:silent redraw!<CR> The above solution leaves vim purely for editing, and tig for doing the actual git presentation. Asciinema demo of tig blame: https://asciinema.org/a/4as7ujt8cpnpyx0doyrervatl Just like fugitive,
Read the rest
I can travel back and forth through history. And if I hit q, I'm back in vim. [1]: https://github.com/jonas/tig
In Git 2.13
There are some good tips there, like using GPG. I am definitively going to get that set up for my project. Now, I always merge with no fast-forward because it creates a commit for the merge that you can revert. git merge --no-ff Then, I always pull with rebase... That will apply your changes on top of the remote ones. It may lead to conflicts but it leads to a log with less branches. git pull --rebase The merge/diff tool I use is p4diff, which comes with P4V (Perforce visual client) and is free. To explore the git log, I use tig. https://github.com/jonas/tig It is a curses interface to git. Screenshot: https://atlassianblog.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/tig-2....
In Better Git configuration

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.