jsource

The one other example I know that morphs the language to that extent and to the detriment of readability by C programmers is the J interpreter[1,2]. But, once again, nobody (that I’ve read) claims it’s good or clear C. (Good C for those who speak J, maybe; I wouldn’t know.) For a way to morph C syntax that does make things better, see libmill[3]. [1] https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Essays/Incunabulum [2] https://github.com/jsoftware/jsource/tree/master/jsrc [3] https://250bpm.com/blog:56/

Try the J source code, like https://github.com/jsoftware/jsource/blob/master/jsrc/v.c F1(jttable){A z,zz;I r,wr; F1PREFIP;ARGCHK1(w); // We accept the pristine calculations from ravel wr=AR(w); r=(RANKT)jt->ranks; r=wr<r?wr:r; // r=rank to use // obsolete RZ(IRSIP1(w,0L,r-1<0?0:r-1,jtravel,z)); // perform ravel on items RZ(IRSIP1(w,0L,r-((UI)r>0),jtravel,z)); // perform ravel on items R r?z:IRSIP1(z,0L,0L,jtravel,zz); // If we are raveling atoms, do it one more time on atoms } // ,."r y Quoting https://corecursive.com/065-competitive-coding-with-conor-ho... : > Yeah. I started a project a couple months ago. I’m slowly porting that code base, the J source code to C++ 20. And yeah, I think there should be a name for these types of code bases, because it’s not C, it’s like a macro variant of C, where it’s a CDSL,