HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
jtbg
reddit-10-year-data
OPEN SOURCE2015–2015
jtbg / reddit-10-year-data · Archived

reddit-10-year-data

Data from the last ten years of reddit

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
45GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Data from the last ten years of reddit

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-06-23 19:29:59 UTC to 2015-06-23 21:21:50 UTC.

012015-06-23 19:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-23 20:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJun 23, 19:002015-06-23 20:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-23 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJun 23, 20:002015-06-23 21:00:00 UTC to 2015-06-23 22:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJun 23, 21:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jun 23, 19:002015-06-23 19:00:00 UTC2015-06-23 20:00:00 UTC101
Jun 23, 20:002015-06-23 20:00:00 UTC2015-06-23 21:00:00 UTC000
Jun 23, 21:002015-06-23 21:00:00 UTC2015-06-23 22:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
I'm not sure we were quite double their size. In July 2010, Digg claimed to have 200M pageviews[0] and we had 279M[1]. So I think we were more like 40% bigger in terms of pageviews, which Chris's post from the time[2] seems to confirm. Though we were undercounting a bit[3], so it was probably more like 55% or 60%. And when it comes to uniques, my memory's pretty foggy, so please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think Digg actually had more than we did at that point. That said, you're absolutely correct that we were far from struggling, except in terms of getting approval from Conde Nast to buy more AWS power, or to hire, or to get any support whatsoever from their ad sales team. [0] http://thenextweb.com/socialmedia/2010/08/28/kevin-rose-resp... [1] https://github.com/drunken-economist/reddit-10-year-data/blo... [2] https://www.reddit.com/r
Read the rest
In Happy 10th birthday to us

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.