HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
JuliaLang
PackageCompiler.jl
Julia2018–2023
JuliaLang / PackageCompiler.jl

PackageCompiler.jl

Compile your Julia Package

30Distinct people
39Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
1.6KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Compile your Julia Package

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 6:36:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year39 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2018-02-04 22:22:11 UTC to 2023-12-04 11:20:35 UTC.

0369122018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 6 mentions; 0 submissions, 6 comments20182019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 11 mentions; 0 submissions, 11 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 0 submissions, 8 comments20202021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 0 submissions, 7 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 0 submissions, 5 comments2023

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC606
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC11011
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC808
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC707
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC505

What Hacker News says

6 sources
Like Stefan said, static compilation has been possible for years, just not very user friendly. We've been working on making compilation easier here: https://github.com/JuliaLang/PackageCompiler.jl And we have a package for building complete, standalone, desktop applications out of the compiled code, here: https://github.com/NHDaly/ApplicationBuilder.jl > does this involve bundling all of Julia w/llvm and all? Yeah, more or less. It involves bundling the julia runtime shared library (no different than a C++ program needs access to the C++ runtime library, except that usually comes pre-installed), and all its dependencies, which yes, includes llvm and all. A far-off goal is to be able to shave off the pieces of the runtime you don't need, such as LLVM if everything is precompiled, FFTW if your program isn't doing heavy linear algebra, etc.
In Writing a simple SQL interpreter in Julia
Oh, my bad, the original link was: https://github.com/SimonDanisch/PackageCompiler.jl. Now I see that redirects to JuliaLang. However, unless I'm missing something, that argument isn't that much stronger. 1. Is the package actually promoted and actively maintained by the Julia developers? Or even better: 2. Is the package part of the default Julia installation? And even: 3. Is the package documented on the Julia site, as part of an officially recommended process?
In My favorite things that are coming with Julia 1.0

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.