HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
kantord
frecenfile
Rust2025–2025
kantord / frecenfile

frecenfile

List frecent files in a Git repository

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
11GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

List frecent files in a Git repository

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2025-05-02 12:54:24 UTC to 2025-09-24 16:38:39 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

012025-04-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsApr 282025-05-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJul 72025-07-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-07-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-08-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-08-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-08-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-08-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-08-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-08-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-08-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-08-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-09-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-09-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-09-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-09-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-09-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-09-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-09-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsSep 22

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Apr 282025-04-28 00:00:00 UTC2025-05-05 00:00:00 UTC110
May 52025-05-05 00:00:00 UTC2025-05-12 00:00:00 UTC000
May 122025-05-12 00:00:00 UTC2025-05-19 00:00:00 UTC000
May 192025-05-19 00:00:00 UTC2025-05-26 00:00:00 UTC000
May 262025-05-26 00:00:00 UTC2025-06-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 22025-06-02 00:00:00 UTC2025-06-09 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 92025-06-09 00:00:00 UTC2025-06-16 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 162025-06-16 00:00:00 UTC2025-06-23 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 232025-06-23 00:00:00 UTC2025-06-30 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 302025-06-30 00:00:00 UTC2025-07-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 72025-07-07 00:00:00 UTC2025-07-14 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 142025-07-14 00:00:00 UTC2025-07-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 212025-07-21 00:00:00 UTC2025-07-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 282025-07-28 00:00:00 UTC2025-08-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 42025-08-04 00:00:00 UTC2025-08-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 112025-08-11 00:00:00 UTC2025-08-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 182025-08-18 00:00:00 UTC2025-08-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 252025-08-25 00:00:00 UTC2025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 12025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-09-08 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 82025-09-08 00:00:00 UTC2025-09-15 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 152025-09-15 00:00:00 UTC2025-09-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 222025-09-22 00:00:00 UTC2025-09-29 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
Once you have a little frecency command-line utility like https://github.com/c-blake/adix/blob/master/util/lfreq.nim (inspired by this very HN thread!) and then either fzf, vip (https://github.com/c-blake/bu/blob/main/doc/vip.md), or whatever, the essence of the idea is really just two lines of Zsh code (https://github.com/c-blake/bu/blob/main/doc/vip.md#combining...). It's only a couple dozen more to have a more robust/complete system, though with shared-across-shells PWD histories and long-term saving somewhere with lock files. As another example of why a simple CL utility for frecency alone is nice, you can basically replicate https://github.com/kantord/frecenfile with a shell 1-liner: git log --pretty=format: --name-only | tac | sed '/^$/d' | lfreq -n9 -o.999 In a little timing test I did this morning, that was about 270X faster
Read the rest
than the git log itself on the Linux kernel (61 seconds to git log, but only 227 ms to `lfreq` it). Besides all that, there's also the distributed-with-Zsh `cdr` (`man zshcontrib` or similar to read all about that).
In Zoxide: A Better CD Command
kantord·May 2, 2025Submission

Show HN: Frecenfile – Instantly rank Git files by edit activity

frecenfile is a tiny CLI tool written in Rust that analyzes your Git commit history in order to identify "hot" or "trending" files using a frecency score that incorporates both the frequency and recency of edits. It is fast enough to get an instant response in most repositories, and you will get a reasonably fast response in practically any repository. It can be useful for getting a list of "recent"/important files when Git history is the only "usage" history you have available.
2 points · Open discussion

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.