HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
katobungen
LANA_report_202607
TeX2026–2026
katobungen / LANA_report_202607

LANA_report_202607

In this repository, the LANA Project has published its July 2026 report “Project LANA Interim Report on IUT Theory.”

4Distinct people
4Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
19GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

In this repository, the LANA Project has published its July 2026 report “Project LANA Interim Report on IUT Theory.”

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week4 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2026-07-17 19:11:49 UTC to 2026-09-10 22:58:48 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

012026-07-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJul 132026-07-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-07-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-08-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-08-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-08-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2026-08-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-08-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsAug 102026-08-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-08-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-08-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-08-31 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-08-31 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-09-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-09-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-09-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsSep 7

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jul 132026-07-13 00:00:00 UTC2026-07-20 00:00:00 UTC101
Jul 202026-07-20 00:00:00 UTC2026-07-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 272026-07-27 00:00:00 UTC2026-08-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 32026-08-03 00:00:00 UTC2026-08-10 00:00:00 UTC101
Aug 102026-08-10 00:00:00 UTC2026-08-17 00:00:00 UTC101
Aug 172026-08-17 00:00:00 UTC2026-08-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 242026-08-24 00:00:00 UTC2026-08-31 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 312026-08-31 00:00:00 UTC2026-09-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 72026-09-07 00:00:00 UTC2026-09-14 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

4 sources
> It would be nice if someone used AI and/or Lean to sort out the abc conjecture, an important unsolved problem in Diophantine analysis. People did attempt this: https://github.com/katobungen/LANA_report_202607/blob/pdf/LA... See also https://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=15770 Here are Kirti Joshi's comments about the LANA project report: https://bpb-us-e2.wpmucdn.com/sites.arizona.edu/dist/4/404/f...
In OpenAI’s Navier-Stokes release included a Lean 4 formal proof
This is a reference to Inter-Universal Teichmüller Theory. Its Wikipedia article gives a good overview (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inter-universal_Teichm%C3%BCll...). In maths lasting disagreements over a published "proof" are rare, but IUTT is an example of it. What the article misses: There is a more recent, ongoing effort to formalize the published proof in Lean under the name of "LANA" (e.g. see https://zen.ac.jp/news/zmcpostevent0717e and https://github.com/katobungen/LANA_report_202607/blob/pdf/LA... for a recent update). I guess most mathematicians agree that a successful compile of the proof in Lean would confirm its validity. My personal impression is that the process got stuck at the very point Peter Scholze and Jakob Stix pointed out 8 years ago. Officially LANA has still not reached a conclusion.
In What sort of maths are LLMs good at?
An attempt at formalizing in Lean Mochizuki's ITU and put an end to the controversy produced by a 500 pages "proof" that no one can actually understands. Additional information: https://github.com/katobungen/LANA_report_202607 Mochizuki himself has also started a "skeleton" formalization attempt of his theory: https://aitpm.github.io/slides/Mochizuki.pdf?utm_source=chat... Surprisingly enough, no one seem to have tried to use LLM's to do the work (or parts of it).
In Project Lana attempts to formalize hard to understand Mochizuki's IUT in Lean

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.