records

SQL for Humans™

7Distinct people

9Mentions

0Explicit recommenders

7.2KGitHub stars

REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

SQL for Humans™

GitHub

No documented product use has been verified yet.

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 11:34:28 AM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

HN mentions by year9 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2016-02-07 16:53:58 UTC to 2019-05-07 18:32:20 UTC.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges

UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
Period	Start (UTC)	End (exclusive, UTC)	Mentions	Submissions	Comments
2016	2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC	2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC	6	1	5
2017	2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC	2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC	2	0	2
2018	2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC	2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC	0	0	0
2019	2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC	2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC	1	0	1

2 sources

Kenneth Reitz's records library is similar (and also reliant on Sqlalchemy): https://github.com/kennethreitz/records

Yep. I'm wondering if a framework would ever adopt something like Records [1]. 1: https://github.com/kennethreitz/records (same author as Requests)