kilocode

Interesting, any plans to add LiteLLM (https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm) and Kilocode (https://github.com/Kilo-Org/kilocode)?

I use it via the Kilo Code extension for VSCode, which is invoking Qwen3-Coder via a Cerebras Code subscription. https://github.com/Kilo-Org/kilocode https://www.cerebras.ai/blog/introducing-cerebras-code

Amp Code is also very good, they released about 2 weeks ago their Oracle feature which leverages o3 to do reviews (https://ampcode.com/news/oracle). Amp leans the closer to Claude Code more than other solutions I’ve seen so far, the team there is really leaning into the agentic approach. I watch the changes on Kilo Code as well (https://github.com/Kilo-Org/kilocode). Their goal is to merge the best from Cline & Roo Code then sprinkle their own improvements on top.

I've been a software developer for over 8 years and recently started using AI to help me code. The OSS project I'm currently working on (Kilo Code [1]) basically also attracts the same type of people: People with software dev. experience who like to use AI to help them do things they already know, just faster. They also don't want to be called "vibe coders". A few days ago, I created a question on a subreddit called "ChatGPTCoding" (which you'd expect to be filled with "vibe coders")[2], asking people if they do "vibe coding" or "AI assisted coding". Surprisingly, almost NOBODY replies that they do "vibe coding". One guy described vibe coding as "using AI while not having a clue what you're doing." Am I the only one who wants to be using AI to help me code/design/etc., but I don't want to put under the umbrella of a "vibe coder"? If yes,

Hey, we can't reproduce it. Could you maybe jump in and give some more details? https://github.com/Kilo-Org/kilocode/issues/349

We added it to the issues: https://github.com/Kilo-Org/kilocode/issues/349

I learned about your project from your comment on the Windsurf post but wanted to suggest that you plug your URL anytime you plug the project since it can make the difference between someone "adding it to their eventual list" versus "open in new tab, read, enjoy, engage" https://github.com/Kilo-Org/kilocode#-kilo-code (Apache 2)

We're reaching a point where we don't need to switch to another IDE (from VS Code/IntelliJ/insert-your-IDE-here) for "AI/vibe coding" IDEs can support "AI coding agents" on their own. The entire workflow for "AI coding agents" boils down to: 1. You write a prompt 2. The "agent" wraps it in a system prompt and sends it to the LLM 3. The LLM sends back a response 4. The agent performs specific actions based on that response (editing files, creating new ones, etc.) Microsoft already started doing that with Copilot. And they have a vibrant ecosystem of VS Code extensions (I maintain one of them [1]) "AI agents" should be a feature, not a separate piece of software (IDE) that's integral to software devs. [1] https://github.com/Kilo-Org/kilocode

Why do we need a new IDE for "AI/vibe coding"? The entire workflow for "AI coding agents" boils down to: 1. You write a prompt 2. The agent wraps it in a system prompt and sends it to the LLM 3. The LLM sends back a response 4. The agent performs specific actions based on that response (editing files, creating new ones, etc.) I don't see why anyone would ditch their current (non-AI) IDE for Cursor just to get this functionality (especially if you're getting hit with a monthly subscription fee on top of it.) P.S. I maintain a VS Code extension that does the 4 steps above as a baseline[1] [1] https://github.com/Kilo-Org/kilocode

It's open source: https://github.com/Kilo-Org/kilocode, so they are giving back. I haven't looked into what features they offer, since I'm happy with Cline for now