HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
koverstreet
bcachefs-tools
Rust2024–2025
koverstreet / bcachefs-tools

bcachefs-tools

http://bcachefs.org

3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
228GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

http://bcachefs.org

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by month3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2024-08-31 03:52:28 UTC to 2025-06-09 12:32:06 UTC.

0122024-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 commentsAug 20242024-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJan 20252025-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsJun 2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Aug 20242024-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-09-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Sep 20242024-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-10-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 20242024-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-11-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 20242024-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-12-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 20242024-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 20252025-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-03-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 20252025-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 20252025-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-05-01 00:00:00 UTC000
May 20252025-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20252025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-07-01 00:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

3 sources
The list of dependencies doesn't really seem crazy. Logging, parsing command line arguments, band-aiding error traits, working with uuids, reading binary data, "memset_s". All of those should be a part of the standard library as in any other programming language. The fact that you simply cannot build anything but trivial examples without taking a dependency on a third party library is just plain ridiculous and hinders Rust's adoption (as seen in this case). It's especially ridiculous considering Rust positions itself to be used in mission critical systems and yet essentially requires you to implicitly trust hundreds of maintainers for any non trivial project to not be malicious. https://github.com/koverstreet/bcachefs-tools/blob/b422b19f6...
In Orphaning bcachefs-tools in Debian
> Packaging a dozen version of the same library? Cargo uses semver for unifying minor dependency versions, so you don't have dozens versions. It's one per major version. It's not even that different from what Debian does when they package "libfoo5" and "libfoo7". Cargo can have them coexist automatically without renaming, but apt needs this done manually, which creates lots of useless busywork for maintainers who need to map Cargo's requirements to apt's patched forks of Cargo packages. The real difference is that Cargo unifies versions by upgrading packages to the latest compatible version, and Debian unifies by downgrading to outdated incompatible unsupported junk. > What is the alternative to relaxing deps? In this case Debian has unforked bindgen, which removed an important patch that the project required: https://github.com/koverstre
Read the rest
et/bcachefs-tools/issues/202#iss... This doesn't need any sophisticated technology. It needs not futzing with upstream's dependency requirements.
In Orphaning Bcachefs Tools in Debian

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.