HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
kriskowal
q
JavaScript2010–2016
kriskowal / q · Archived

q

A promise library for JavaScript

44Distinct people
51Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
15KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A promise library for JavaScript

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 2:59:58 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year51 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2010-09-16 15:45:55 UTC to 2016-10-16 22:21:59 UTC.

051015202010-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20102011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 14 mentions; 2 submissions, 12 comments2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 22 mentions; 0 submissions, 22 comments20132014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 9 mentions; 0 submissions, 9 comments2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2016

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20102010-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20112011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20122012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC14212
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC22022
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC909
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

From the project README

An excerpt from the repository, fetched Nov 13, 2026.

Read the project’s introduction
Note Please consider using JavaScript promises instead of Q. Native promises are faster, have better tooling support and are the future. When work on Q began, promises were an academic novelty in JavaScript, unlikely to be adopted much less popular, though obviously full of…promise. Callbacks dominated the landscape. Q aimed to introduce a technology to JavaScript that had been proven and vetted in languages like E and C♯. With four years of incubation, evangelism, education, and feedback, promises became part of the language. Every modern browser contains a built-in Promise implementation. Being able to influence the internet and working on a library used by millions of codebases was an exciting and humbling experience. Q isn't going anywhere. The code is still here and bugs will be fixed but further development has been unnecessary for many years. We encourage you to read the code and the explainers to glimpse into the history of the internet. Q If a function cannot return a value or throw an exception without blocking, it can return a promise instead. A promise is an object that represents the return value or the thrown exception that the function may eventually provide. A promise can also be used as a proxy for a remote object to overcome latency. On the first pass, promises can mitigate the “Pyramid of Doom”: the situation where code marches to the right faster than it marches forward. step1(function (value1) { step2(value1, function(value2) { step3(value2, function(value3) { step4(value3, function(value4) { // Do something with value4 }); }); }); }); With a promise library, you can flatten the pyramid. Q.fcall(promisedStep1) .then(promisedStep2) .then(promisedStep3) .then(promisedStep4) .then(function (value4) { // Do something with value4 }) .catch(function (error) { // Handle any error from all above steps }) .done(); With this approach, you also get implicit error propagation, just like try, catch, and finally. An error in promisedStep1 will flow all the way to the catch function, where it’s caught and handled. (Here promisedStepN is a version of stepN that returns a promise.) The callback approach is called an “inversion of control”. A function that accepts a callback instead of a return value is saying, “Don’t call me, I’ll call you.”. Promises un-invert the inversion, cleanly separating the input arguments from control flow arguments. This simplifies the use and creation of API’s, particularly variadic, rest and spread arguments. Getting Started The Q module can be loaded as: A <script> tag (creating a Q global variable): ~2.5 KB minified and gzipped. A Node.js and CommonJS module, available in npm as the q package An AMD module A component as microjs/q Using bower as q#^1.4.1 Using NuGet as Q Q can exchange promises with jQuery, Dojo, When.js, WinJS, and more. Resources Our wiki contains a number of useful resources, including: A method-by-method Q API reference. A growing examples gallery, showing how Q can be used to make everything better. From XHR to database access to accessing the Flickr API, Q is there for you. There are many libraries that produce and consume Q promises for everything from file system/database access or RPC to templating. For a list of some of the more popular ones, see Libraries. If you want materials that introduce the promise concept generally, and the below tutorial isn't doing it for you, check out our collection of presentations, blog posts, and podcasts. A guide for those coming from jQuery's $.Deferred. We'd also love to have you join the Q-Continuum mailing list. Tutorial Promises have a then method, which you can use to get the eventual return value (fulfillment) or thrown exception (rejection). promiseMeSomething() .then(function (value) { }, function (reason) { }); If promiseMeSomething returns a promise that gets fulfilled later with a return value, the first function (the fulfillment handler) will be called with the value. However, if the promiseMeSomething function gets rejected later by a thrown exception, the second function (the rejection handler) will be called with the exception. Note that resolution of a promise is always asynchronous: that is, the fulfillment or rejection handler will always be called in the next turn of the event loop (i.e. process.nextTick in Node). This gives you a nice guarantee when mentally tracing the flow of your code, namely that then will always return before either handler is executed. In this tutorial, we begin with how to consume and work with promises. We'll talk about how to create them, and thus create functions like promiseMeSomething that return promises, below. Propagation The then method returns a promise, which in this example, I’m assigning to outputPromise. var outputPromise = getInputPromise() .then(function (input) { }, function (reason) { }); The outputPromise variable becomes a new promise for the return value of either handler. Since a function can only either return a value or throw an exception, only one handler will ever be called and it will be responsible for resolving outputPromise. If you return a value in a handler, outputPromise will get fulfilled. If you throw an exception in a handler, outputPromise will get rejected. If you return a promise in a handler, outputPromise will “become” that promise. Being able to become a new promise is useful for managing delays, combining results, or recovering from errors. If the getInputPromise() promise gets rejected and you omit the rejection handler, the error will go to outputPromise: var outputPromise = getInputPromise() .then(function (value) { }); If the input promise gets fulfilled and you omit the fulfillment handler, the value will go to outputPromise: var outputPromise = getInputPromise() .then(null, function (error) { }); Q promises provide a fail shorthand for then when you are only interested in handling the error: var output
Read the full README on GitHub

What Hacker News says

9 sources
It's honestly not as much of an issue as it's often made out to be. There are a ton of ways to manage asynchronous code out there including but not limited to all the various promise libraries such as when.js(https://github.com/cujojs/when), q (https://github.com/kriskowal/q), and bluebird (https://github.com/petkaantonov/bluebird). Not to mention the Async library (https://github.com/caolan/async) which is full of tools to help manage it. As for blocking, it's something you deal with. Realistically speaking if you're doing CPU intensive tasks then Node is definitely the wrong solution. However, if you're doing tasks that are IO oriented then Node is fantastic.
In Yahoo Mail moving to React
It's actually a very little function I wrote, based on `tee` Unix shell command: http://unixhelp.ed.ac.uk/CGI/man-cgi?tee It looks like this: tee = (func, val) --> func(val); val which could be equivalently written as: tee = (func) -> (val) -> func(val); val In other words it's an identity function which additionally executes some other function for side-effects. In the shell the `tee` command always writes to the file, while my version can execute any side-effect, but I think my version is just a generalization of the standard Unix command and so I named it like this. I'm sure this function has its own, formal name, with the word "monad" or "combinator" (maybe K combinator?) in it, but I wasn't patient enough to research it :) `thenResolve` is a standard method on a promise object implemented by the Q library (https://github.co
Read the rest
m/kriskowal/q/wiki/API-Reference#promisethe...) I used, it's equivalent to .then () -> accum In other words, `thenResolve` appends a success callback which discards previous value and always returns another value. Once again, take a look at the full source at http://klibert.pl/walkfiles.html - I'm going to update it with a full explanation of what's going on, but even right now it's only 90 lines with including comments, and should be a good example of main LS strengths. I'm probably going to write another example which makes use of even more (and more advanced) LS features when I'm done with explaining this one.
In Pun: A small library to enable pattern matching in JavaScript and CoffeeScript
The comparison page highlights that Zone.js is better than promises because of long stack traces [1], but most promise implementations already have that [2]. I'm confused, that seems to be the only comparison to promises. Edit: Conceptually it seems the same as promises. The main difference seems to be that they've added hooks [3] into the pipeline, and they duck punch the core API to intercept errors. Bluebird has solved this without duck punching using `Promise.promisifyAll(require("fs"))` [4]. I would love to see a write up on Zone.js's forks, because the article could of trivially been rewriten to use promises. [1] http://strongloop.com/strongblog/comparing-node-js-promises-... [2] https://github.com/kriskowal/q#long-stack-traces [3] https://github.com/btford/zone.js/#zonefork [4] https://github.com/petkaantonov/bluebird
In Zones – Robust error handling and flow control for Node.js
Your example illustrates the problem nicely. The code above is impossible to parse without knowing that "future" is a special value. Note that after you assign `a = future` you have no idea that a is special. Separate the code into three modules: the first contains lines 1 and 2, the second contains line 3 and the third contains lines 4 and 5. Now, looking at the second module you have no idea if the execution blocks on `console.log(a,b);` or not. More importantly, even if all the code is written as nicely as the example above you still cannot reason about this like you could about every other goddamn language out there. You can't pick arbitrary lines of code from the listing and execute them in that order, and if you try to figure out how it works (even if it's written without deadlocks) you will break your brain. Instead, let's somethin
Read the rest
g like $q [1], or even just the smaller/simpler AngularJS implementation of it [2]. While requiring callbacks, it's still very workable and does simplify things. Adding chained callbacks is very nice: var resp = $.get('/my/url'); showLoadingScreen(); resp.then(function(data) { return JSON.parse(data); } resp.then(function(data) { alert('data.username = ' + data.username); } resp.catch(function(err) { alert('Error: ' + err); }) resp.finally(function() { hideLoadingScreen(); }) [1] https://github.com/kriskowal/q/wiki/API-Reference [2] https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng/service/$q
In Better JavaScript Promises

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.