HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
kristrev
multihomed-routing
C2017–2022
kristrev / multihomed-routing

multihomed-routing

Tools and scripts for configuring multihomed routing on Linux

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
68GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Tools and scripts for configuring multihomed routing on Linux

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2017-05-04 16:26:33 UTC to 2022-08-27 13:48:30 UTC.

012017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments20172018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20192020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2022

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
Are you asking about hardware or the routing configuration? If configuration, there are some example scripts on github not tested by me [1] that create a base configuration and have templates for creating traffic balancing rules. To find more examples one could use google to search for "site:github.com linux multihomed routing". Some of these scripts use routing table rules and some use iptables. My personal preference would be to use routing rules as they have a lower CPU impact and keep iptables rules cleaner and simpler. For hardware I prefer to get fanless mini-pc style routers that have multiple 1gbe or 2.5gbe interfaces so that it's easier to apply rules and also traffic shaping to them. I use protectli devices and load alpine linux on them but really anything will do. CPU speed only starts to matter if they plan on doing netw
Read the rest
ork VPN's on their router. If they can find one with Intel server NIC's that can allow for more network driver options but any Intel NIC's would be better than some of the other options that come with some of the fanless PC's in my opinion and experience. [1] - https://github.com/kristrev/multihomed-routing
In Ask HN: Dual WAN routers for bonding/load balancing?

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.