HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
ktoso
swift-evolution
JavaScript2021–2025
ktoso / swift-evolution

swift-evolution

This maintains proposals for changes and user-visible enhancements to the Swift Programming Language.

3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
5GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

This maintains proposals for changes and user-visible enhancements to the Swift Programming Language.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:03:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2021-08-15 12:05:27 UTC to 2025-02-19 11:18:59 UTC.

0122021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments20212022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20232024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

3 sources
If an actor system is fully synchronous, it is much less efficient and can't be reentrant. Actor implementations tend to be split on reentrancy. Having multiple paused in-flight invocations of the actor means that you need to have clearly understood suspension points (hence await keywords). Non-reentrant actors like in Erlang can deadlock if two actor instances are calling one another. Because of the deadlock and some inefficiency concerns, some actor systems allow you to decide reentrancy per-actor as well. Because Swift concurrency is an upgrade on top of decades-old systems, I believe a certain amount of additional complexity was required whether it was built as reentrant or not. It was a bit harder to find than I expected, but here is a discussion piece around the initial choice of reentrancy by default. https://github.com/ktoso/swift
Read the rest
In How Actors Work Internally in Swift

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.