HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
kubernetes-sigs
cluster-api
Go2018–2022
kubernetes-sigs / cluster-api

cluster-api

Home for Cluster API, a subproject of sig-cluster-lifecycle

7Distinct people
8Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
4.3KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Home for Cluster API, a subproject of sig-cluster-lifecycle

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:03:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year8 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2018-05-07 18:56:19 UTC to 2022-07-24 16:59:15 UTC.

01232018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments20182019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20202021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2022

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

8 sources
I can’t think of a worse way to manage Kubernetes than Terraform. After years of running into issues, I think it’s really only suitable for small clusters. ClusterAPI has been the way my company has been doing things lately and I can honestly tell you it’s been transformative. https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api There’s nothing more amazing that updating a kubelet version in a git repo and watching ClusterAPI carefully cordoning off nodes and moving our workloads to new machines while I sit back and watch via ArgoCD.
In Docker, Kubernetes, Terraform, and AWS crash course series
That's all nice. The issue though is that BOSH has been completely leapfrogged by Kubernetes with its extensible API. Nowhere will BOSH ever get to the community reach and acceptance of the level of Kubernetes. That Boat has sailed. And with implementations of the machine specs [0,1,2,3] you get rid of the "media break" that you deem BOSH is filling (it is not). Maybe you could implement BOSH as implementation of the machine spec and integrate into K8s, the other way round than KuBo? As for the bunch of data services, I guess it's only a matter of time until you see a cambrian explosion of productive operators. I mean this non-comprehensive list [4] is already impressive. SAP works in many projects where obligations with long term commitments have to be kept. And that is ok. BOSH CPI is one experiment to get CF on K8s. Have a look at the
Read the rest
one which seems more attainable [6]. But these activities are an indicator of the elephant in the room, namely CF & K8s: Will it blend? [5] I work for SAP in the inter-junction of SaaS, PaaS & IaaS and K8s. [0] https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api [1] https://github.com/kube-node/nodeset [2] https://github.com/gardener/machine-controller-manager [3] https://github.com/kubeup/archon [4] https://github.com/operator-framework/awesome-operators [5] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ow7IumxkOM [6] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qs6UQQDWMkfOpY19XqS3CfvI...
In Gardener: Manage Kubernetes clusters across multiple cloud providers
Actually it is already possible to create persistent disks through Kubernetes by creating a persistent volume claim (pvc) which triggers an actual persistent volume to be created. Cloud provider controllers take care of this, just like they create load balancers for services. Also there’s already work being done on supporting cluster management from Kubernetes itself: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api
In As Kubernetes grows, a startup ecosystem develops in its wake

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.