tree-of-thoughts

Just gonna leave this here: https://github.com/kyegomez/tree-of-thoughts/issues/78#issue... Also this part from the reply before editing it away: They get mad that my repo and code is better than their's and they published they paper, they feel entitled even though I reproduced the entire paper based on 4 phrases, dfs, bfs (search algos), generate solutions, and generate thoughts and this is it. I didn't even read the full paper when I first started to implement it. The reason they want people to unstar my repo is because they are jealous that they made a mistake by not sharing the code when they published the paper as real scientists would do. If you do not publish your code as a AI research scientists you are a heretic, as your work cannot be tried and tested. and the code works amazingly much better than theirs, I looked at their code

This is Shunyu, author of Tree oF Thoughts (arxiv.org/abs/2305.10601). The official code to replicate paper results is https://github.com/ysymyth/tree-of-thought-llm Not https://github.com/kyegomez/tree-of-thoughts which according to many who told me, is not right/good implementation of ToT, cannot replicate paper results, and damages the reputation of ToT I explained the situation here: https://twitter.com/ShunyuYao12/status/1663946702754021383 I'd appreciate your help by unstaring his and staring mine, as currently Github and Google searches go to his repo by default, and it has been very misleading for many users. Thanks!

This is Shunyu, author of Tree oF Thoughts (arxiv.org/abs/2305.10601). The official code to replicate paper results is https://github.com/ysymyth/tree-of-thought-llm Not https://github.com/kyegomez/tree-of-thoughts which according to many who told me, is not right/good implementation of ToT, and damages the reputation of ToT I explained the situation here: https://twitter.com/ShunyuYao12/status/1663946702754021383 I'd appreciate your help by unstaring his and staring mine, as currently Github and Google searches go to his repo by default, and it has been very misleading for many users.

Here are the prompts templates from the main code: prompt = f"Given the current state of reasoning: '{state_text}', pessimitically evaluate its value as a float between 0 and 1 based on it's potential to achieve {inital_prompt}" prompt = f"Write down your observations in format 'Observation:xxxx', then write down your thoughts in format 'Thoughts:xxxx Given the current state of reasoning: '{state_text}', generate {k} coherent solutions to achieve {state_text}" prompt = f"Given the current state of reasoning: '{state_text}', pessimistically evaluate its value as a float between 0 and 1 based on its potential to achieve {initial_prompt}" self.ReAct_prompt = "Write down your observations in format 'Observation:xxxx', then write down your thoughts in format 'Thoughts:xxxx'." prompt = f"Given the current state of reasoning: '{sta