HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
LAION-AI
Open-Assistant
Python2022–2023
LAION-AI / Open-Assistant

Open-Assistant

OpenAssistant is a chat-based assistant that understands tasks, can interact with third-party systems, and retrieve information dynamically to do so.

26Distinct people
35Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
37.3KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

OpenAssistant is a chat-based assistant that understands tasks, can interact with third-party systems, and retrieve information dynamically to do so.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week35 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2022-12-25 14:15:39 UTC to 2023-03-20 22:06:50 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

02462022-12-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-12-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 commentsDec 192022-12-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 2 submissions, 1 comments2023-01-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments2023-01-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2023-01-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2023-01-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 1 submissions, 4 comments2023-01-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-02-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 1 submissions, 6 commentsJan 302023-02-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-02-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-02-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-02-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments2023-02-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-02-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2023-02-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-03-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2023-03-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-03-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2023-03-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-03-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-03-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-03-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMar 20

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Dec 192022-12-19 00:00:00 UTC2022-12-26 00:00:00 UTC211
Dec 262022-12-26 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-02 00:00:00 UTC321
Jan 22023-01-02 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-09 00:00:00 UTC211
Jan 92023-01-09 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-16 00:00:00 UTC303
Jan 162023-01-16 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-23 00:00:00 UTC110
Jan 232023-01-23 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-30 00:00:00 UTC514
Jan 302023-01-30 00:00:00 UTC2023-02-06 00:00:00 UTC716
Feb 62023-02-06 00:00:00 UTC2023-02-13 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 132023-02-13 00:00:00 UTC2023-02-20 00:00:00 UTC404
Feb 202023-02-20 00:00:00 UTC2023-02-27 00:00:00 UTC303
Feb 272023-02-27 00:00:00 UTC2023-03-06 00:00:00 UTC202
Mar 62023-03-06 00:00:00 UTC2023-03-13 00:00:00 UTC202
Mar 132023-03-13 00:00:00 UTC2023-03-20 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 202023-03-20 00:00:00 UTC2023-03-27 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

35 sources
I was looking for open alternatives to self hosted, or crowd hosted finetuned LLMs like ChatGPT and found LAION Open Assistant. Then found resources to further optimize inference as well as training: - Open source fine tuned assistants like LAION Open-Assistant [1] - inference optimizations like VoltaML, FlexGenm Distributed Inference [2] - training optimizations like Hivemind [2] 1 https://github.com/LAION-AI/Open-Assistant 2 https://github.com/underlines/awesome-marketing-datascience/...
In EleutherAI announces it has become a non-profit
Hooking ChatGPT (and similar architectures) into applications is going to be the next big thing. It just takes time to hook up various systems. Eventually a vision module will be integrated and it will probably be able to "figure out" most systems. There's a lot of money to be made in hooking up these "brains" into apps. I hope people get on it, since it will be quite convenient. See: Act-1: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32842860 Open-Assistant: https://github.com/LAION-AI/Open-Assistant Toolformer: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04761 Understanding HTML with LLMs: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03945
In Ask HN: Are people using ChatGPT to run things?
LAION is working on an open chatgpt like model [0] and there is a project discussed here recently that is about running the llms on single gpus [1] I agree, there is a very serious risk of newer AI advances being closed by default, and I think it's not being taken seriously enough. Even "open" players are still for-profit, say Huggingface. There really needs to be Linux or FSF like players that are motivated by freedom. [0] https://github.com/LAION-AI/Open-Assistant [1] https://github.com/FMInference/FlexGen
In Data Science and LLM (LLaMA vs. GPT-3): A Revolution That Will Change the World
Look at OpenAssistant (https://github.com/LAION-AI/Open-Assistant); they are trying to give a chatbot the ability to trigger actions in other systems. I fleshed out a scenario in more detail here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34808674. But in brief, the short-term evolution of LLMs is going to involve something like letting it `eval()` some code to take an action as part of a response to a prompt. A recent paper, Toolformer: https://pub.towardsai.net/exploring-toolformer-meta-ai-new-t... which is training on a small set of hand-chosen tools, rather than `eval(<arbitrary code>)`, but hopefully it's clear that it's a very small step from the former to the latter.
In Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first”
I think this is a sad way to go. Hardware is super expensive to develop and the key IP here is in the software. There's probably some fancy microphone tech, but ultimately you could (should?) run Mycroft on a Raspberry Pi with an edge accelerator device. Technically I think we're getting close to a good offline system. Home Assistant solves the practical aspect of controlling systems and triggered routines - it really works well, at least on par with vendor software. Speech recognition models are usable and getting better. The interesting "glue" is parsing the commands into something reasonable and I think open source LLMs are likely to be the answer. See Open Assistant [0] for example. It doesn't solve the knowledge base issue (e.g. people seem to use Alexa either as a very fancy egg timer, or for querying facts), but it would probably a
Read the rest
llow for very natural interaction with the device and the model could just translate a query into a command that triggers an action. My impression is that Amazon's approach (I have no knowledge of what goes on inside) has been to build fairly complicated subsystems to handle very specific queries. Each "Skill" has to be separately developed and if you ask something outside a fairly rigid grammar, the device has no idea. [0] https://github.com/LAION-AI/Open-Assistant
In Mycroft – Open-source voice assistant in trouble
https://github.com/LAION-AI/Open-Assistant/issues/1110 > https://www.gutenberg.org/ has an extensive collection of ebooks in multiple languages and formats that would make great trianing data … > There is detailed legal information on which books are under public domain and which ones are copyrighted, it would be great if someone would go through these and decide which books are okay to crawl and use as training data (my understanding is that it is okay to scrape the contents as they are publicly available in a browser, but just to be sure) Yup, sure are the same folk who put together that dataset they used to train stable diffusion. Data? Yeah, just take everything. It’s all good.
In Open Assistant: Conversational AI for Everyone

Showing the 15 most recent of 35 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.