HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
laravel
boost
PHP2026–2026
laravel / boost

boost

Laravel-focused MCP server for augmenting your AI powered local development experience.

3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
3.7KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Laravel-focused MCP server for augmenting your AI powered local development experience.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2026-04-16 15:15:23 UTC to 2026-04-17 13:17:31 UTC.

0122026-04-16 15:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-16 16:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 commentsApr 16, 15:002026-04-16 16:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-16 17:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-16 17:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-16 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-16 18:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-16 19:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-16 19:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-16 20:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-16 20:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-16 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-16 21:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-16 22:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-16 22:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-16 23:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-16 23:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-17 01:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-17 01:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-17 02:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-17 02:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-17 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsApr 17, 02:002026-04-17 03:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-17 04:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-17 04:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-17 05:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-17 05:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-17 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-17 06:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-17 07:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-17 07:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-17 08:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-17 08:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-17 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-17 09:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-17 10:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-17 10:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-17 11:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-17 11:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-17 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-17 12:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-17 13:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-17 13:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-17 14:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsApr 17, 13:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Apr 16, 15:002026-04-16 15:00:00 UTC2026-04-16 16:00:00 UTC202
Apr 16, 16:002026-04-16 16:00:00 UTC2026-04-16 17:00:00 UTC000
Apr 16, 17:002026-04-16 17:00:00 UTC2026-04-16 18:00:00 UTC000
Apr 16, 18:002026-04-16 18:00:00 UTC2026-04-16 19:00:00 UTC000
Apr 16, 19:002026-04-16 19:00:00 UTC2026-04-16 20:00:00 UTC000
Apr 16, 20:002026-04-16 20:00:00 UTC2026-04-16 21:00:00 UTC000
Apr 16, 21:002026-04-16 21:00:00 UTC2026-04-16 22:00:00 UTC000
Apr 16, 22:002026-04-16 22:00:00 UTC2026-04-16 23:00:00 UTC000
Apr 16, 23:002026-04-16 23:00:00 UTC2026-04-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 17, 00:002026-04-17 00:00:00 UTC2026-04-17 01:00:00 UTC000
Apr 17, 01:002026-04-17 01:00:00 UTC2026-04-17 02:00:00 UTC000
Apr 17, 02:002026-04-17 02:00:00 UTC2026-04-17 03:00:00 UTC000
Apr 17, 03:002026-04-17 03:00:00 UTC2026-04-17 04:00:00 UTC000
Apr 17, 04:002026-04-17 04:00:00 UTC2026-04-17 05:00:00 UTC000
Apr 17, 05:002026-04-17 05:00:00 UTC2026-04-17 06:00:00 UTC000
Apr 17, 06:002026-04-17 06:00:00 UTC2026-04-17 07:00:00 UTC000
Apr 17, 07:002026-04-17 07:00:00 UTC2026-04-17 08:00:00 UTC000
Apr 17, 08:002026-04-17 08:00:00 UTC2026-04-17 09:00:00 UTC000
Apr 17, 09:002026-04-17 09:00:00 UTC2026-04-17 10:00:00 UTC000
Apr 17, 10:002026-04-17 10:00:00 UTC2026-04-17 11:00:00 UTC000
Apr 17, 11:002026-04-17 11:00:00 UTC2026-04-17 12:00:00 UTC000
Apr 17, 12:002026-04-17 12:00:00 UTC2026-04-17 13:00:00 UTC000
Apr 17, 13:002026-04-17 13:00:00 UTC2026-04-17 14:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

3 sources
I agree that there's a strong need for ad blockers nowadays. I also use uBlock Origin on all my browsers. But I'm not sure if a world that is completely devoid of advertising would... work. Advertising (in some form) is a necessary evil, I think. Any business needs customers to make revenue and, well, exist. So any business needs to have some way to make themselves known to potential customers. In the case of Laravel, they offer an open source framework completely for free, and pay for the development man hours through their commercial offerings, e.g. Laravel Cloud. That commercial offering is not bad: they offer a very smooth way to deploy your Laravel project. In order for the offering to make any revenue, potential customers need to know that it exists, at least. They're still free to choose whether they want to use that commercial off
Read the rest
ering, or if they want to deploy their project on their own. Previously, making sure people knew Laravel Cloud existed was done through the Laravel home page. But nowadays more and more people "consume" a framework's documentation through their AI tooling, and they no longer visit the home page. In a comment [0], which is conveniently being left out of both TFA and most comments on HN, the maintainer even explains that the addition was not meant as a literal advertisement, but as a way to make sure new users of the framework at least _know_ that they can deploy their application on Laravel Cloud. And they are even actively asking for suggestions on how to rephrase the addition so that the AI Tooling does not see it as "you MUST use Laravel Cloud" gospel. [0]: https://github.com/laravel/boost/pull/758#issuecomment-42589...
In Laravel raised money and now injects ads directly into your agent

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.